sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 22, 2009
Registration
No. 333-163228
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
QuinStreet, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
7389
|
|
77-0512121
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1051 East Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 800
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 578-7700
(Address, including zip code
and telephone number, of Registrants principal executive
offices)
Douglas Valenti
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
1051 East Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 800
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 578-7700
(Name, address, including
zip code and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Jodie Bourdet
David Peinsipp
Cooley Godward Kronish LLP
101 California Street,
5th
Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 693-2000
|
|
Alan Denenberg
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 752-2000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION. DATED DECEMBER 22, 2009.
Shares
Common
Stock
This is the initial
public offering of our common stock. Prior to this offering,
there has been no public market for our common stock. The
initial public offering price of our common stock is expected to
be between $ and
$ per share.
We have applied to
list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol QNST.
The underwriters
have an option to purchase a maximum
of
additional shares of common stock from us to cover
over-allotments.
Investing in our
common stock involves risks. See Risk Factors
beginning on page 9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
Other
|
|
Proceeds,
Before
|
|
|
Public
|
|
Commissions(1)
|
|
Expenses, to
us
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes fees
payable to Qatalyst Partners LP for services as our financial
advisor. Qatalyst Partners LP is not acting as an underwriter of
this offering.
|
Delivery of our
shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2010.
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
Credit
Suisse |
BofA Merrill Lynch |
J.P. Morgan |
Qatalyst
Partners LP
Financial
Advisor
The date of this
prospectus
is ,
2010.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or contained in any free writing prospectus filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Neither we
nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with
additional information or information different from that
contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus
filed with the SEC. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers
to buy, our common stock only in jurisdictions where such offers
and sales are permitted. The information contained in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus,
regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any
sale of our common stock.
For investors outside of the United States: Neither we nor the
underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering
or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any
jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. Persons
outside the United States who come into possession of this
prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any
restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of common
stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the
United States.
Until ,
2010 (25 days after commencement of this offering), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade our common stock, whether or not
participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the
obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as
underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that
you should consider in making your investment decision. Before
investing in our common stock, you should carefully read this
entire prospectus, including our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes and the information set forth
under the headings Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, in each case included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless the context otherwise
requires, we use the terms QuinStreet,
company, we, us and
our in this prospectus to refer to QuinStreet, Inc.
and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.
QUINSTREET,
INC.
Overview
QuinStreet is a leader in vertical marketing and media on the
Internet. Vertical marketing and media are focused on matching
targeted segments of visitors with groupings of clients and
product offerings of probable interest to them. Vertical visitor
segments are defined by factors such as life stage, life events,
income, career status, and expressed intent to buy or research a
particular product. This approach is in contrast to marketing
and media that are focused on general consumer interests and
mass market audiences. We have built a strong set of
capabilities to engage Internet visitors with targeted media and
to connect our marketing clients with their potential customers
online. We focus on serving clients in large,
information-intensive industry categories, or verticals, where
relevant, targeted media and offerings help visitors make
informed choices, find the products that match their needs, and
thus become qualified customer prospects for our clients. Our
current primary client verticals are the education and financial
services industries. We also have a presence in the home
services,
business-to-business,
or B2B, and healthcare industries.
We generate revenue by delivering measurable online marketing
results to our clients. These results are typically in the form
of qualified leads or clicks, the outcomes of customer prospects
submitting requests for information on, or to be contacted
regarding, client products, or their clicking on or through to
specific client offers. These qualified leads or clicks are
generated from our marketing activities on our websites or on
third-party websites with whom we have relationships. Clients
primarily pay us for leads that they can convert into customers,
typically in a call center or through other offline customer
acquisition processes, or for clicks from our websites that they
can convert into applications or customers on their websites. We
are predominantly paid on a negotiated or market-driven
per lead or per click basis. Media costs
to generate qualified leads or clicks are borne by us as a cost
of providing our services.
Founded in 1999, we have been a pioneer in the development and
application of measurable marketing on the Internet. Clients pay
us for the actual opt-in actions by prospects or customers that
result from our marketing activities on their behalf, versus
traditional impression-based advertising and marketing models in
which an advertiser pays for more general exposure to an
advertisement. We have been particularly focused on developing
and delivering measurable marketing results in the search engine
ecosystem, the entry point of the Internet for most
of the visitors we convert into qualified leads or clicks for
our clients. We own or partner with vertical content websites
that attract Internet visitors from organic search engine
rankings due to the quality and relevancy of their content to
search engine users. We also acquire targeted visitors for our
websites through the purchase of
pay-per-click,
or PPC, advertisements on search engines. We complement search
engine companies by building websites with content and offerings
that are relevant and responsive to their searchers, and by
increasing the value of the PPC search advertising they sell by
matching visitors with offerings and converting them into
customer prospects for our clients.
Market
Opportunity
Our clients are shifting more of their marketing budgets from
traditional media channels such as direct mail, television,
radio, and newspapers to the Internet because of increasing
usage of the Internet by their potential customers. We believe
that direct marketing is the most applicable and relevant
marketing segment to us because it is targeted and measurable.
According to the July 2009 research report, Consumer
Behavior Online: A 2009 Deep Dive, by Forrester Research,
Americans spend 33% of their time with media on the
1
Internet, but online direct marketing represents only 16% of the
$149 billion in total annual U.S. direct marketing
spending in 2009, as reported by the Direct Marketing
Association. The Internet is an effective direct marketing
medium due to its targeting and measurability characteristics.
If direct marketing budgets shift to the Internet in proportion
to Americans share of time spent with media on the
Internet from 16% to 33% of the $149 billion in
total spending in 2009 that could represent an
increased market opportunity of $25 billion. In addition,
as traditional media categories such as television and radio
shift from analog to digital formats, they then become channels
for the targeted and measurable marketing techniques and
capabilities we have developed for the Internet, thus expanding
our addressable market opportunity. Further future market
potential may also come from international markets.
Our
Business Model
We deliver cost-effective marketing results to our clients,
predictably and scalably, most typically in the form of a
qualified lead or click. These leads or clicks can then convert
into a customer or sale for the client at a rate that results in
an acceptable marketing cost to them. We get paid by clients
primarily when we deliver qualified leads or clicks as defined
in our agreements with them. Because we bear the costs of media,
our programs must deliver a value to our clients and a media
yield, or our ability to generate an acceptable margin on our
media costs, that provides a sound financial outcome for us. Our
general process is:
|
|
|
|
|
We own or access targeted media.
|
|
|
|
We run advertisements or other forms of marketing messages and
programs in that media to create visitor responses or clicks
through to client offerings.
|
|
|
|
We match these responses or clicks to client offerings or brands
that meet visitor interests or needs, converting visitors into
qualified leads or clicks.
|
|
|
|
We optimize client matches and media yield such that we achieve
desired results for clients and a sound financial outcome for us.
|
Our
Competitive Advantages
Our competitive advantages include:
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical focus and expertise
|
|
|
|
Measurable marketing experience and expertise
|
|
|
|
Targeted media
|
|
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
|
Client relationships
|
|
|
|
Client-driven online marketing approach
|
|
|
|
Acquisition strategy and success
|
|
|
|
Scale
|
Our
Strategy
We believe that we are in the early stages of a very large and
long-term business opportunity. Our strategy for pursuing this
opportunity includes the following key components:
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on generating sustainable revenues by providing measurable
value to our clients.
|
|
|
|
Build QuinStreet and our industry sustainably by behaving
ethically in all we do and by providing quality content and
website experiences to Internet visitors.
|
|
|
|
Remain vertically focused, choosing to grow through depth,
expertise and coverage in our current industry verticals; enter
new verticals selectively over time, organically and through
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Build a world class organization, with
best-in-class
capabilities for delivering measurable marketing results to
clients and high yields or returns on media costs.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Develop and evolve the best technologies and platform for
managing vertical marketing and media on the Internet; focus on
technologies that enhance media yield, improve client results
and achieve scale efficiencies.
|
|
|
|
Build, buy and partner with vertical content websites that
provide the most relevant and highest quality visitor
experiences in the client and media verticals we serve.
|
|
|
|
Be a client-driven organization; develop a broad set of media
sources and capabilities to reliably meet client needs.
|
Risks
Associated with Our Business
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties,
including those highlighted in the section entitled Risk
Factors immediately following this prospectus summary,
that primarily represent challenges we face in connection with
the successful implementation of our strategy and the growth of
our business. We operate in an immature industry and have a
rapidly-evolving business model, which make it difficult to
predict our future operating results. In addition, we expect a
number of factors to cause our operating results to fluctuate on
a quarterly and annual basis, which may make it difficult to
predict our future performance.
Corporate
Information
We incorporated in California in April 1999. We intend to
reincorporate in Delaware prior to the completion of this
offering. Our principal executive offices are located at 1051
East Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 800, Foster City, California
94404, and our telephone number is
(650) 578-7700.
Our website address is www.quinstreet.com. We do not incorporate
the information on or accessible through our website into this
prospectus, and you should not consider any information on, or
that can be accessed through, our website as part of this
prospectus, and investors should not rely on any such
information in deciding whether to purchase our common stock.
QuinStreet®,
the QuinStreet logo design and other trademarks or service marks
of QuinStreet appearing in this prospectus are the property of
QuinStreet. This prospectus also contains trademarks and trade
names of other businesses that are the property of their
respective holders.
3
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered by QuinStreet |
|
shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect the net proceeds to us from this offering, after
deduction of the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses, to be approximately
$ million at an assumed
initial public offering price of
$ per share. We intend to use
a portion of the net proceeds of this offering, or approximately
$26.3 million, to repay the outstanding balance of our
five-year term loan, and the remaining net proceeds from this
offering for working capital, capital expenditures and other
general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net
proceeds to repay additional debt or to acquire other
businesses, products or technologies. See Use of
Proceeds. |
|
Dividend policy |
|
We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for
the foreseeable future. |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 9 and the
other information included in this prospectus for a discussion
of factors you should carefully consider before deciding whether
to purchase shares of our common stock. |
|
|
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
QNST |
The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after
this offering is based on 34,631,876 shares of common stock
outstanding as of September 30, 2009, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 10,654,296 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of
September 30, 2009 pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan and having a weighted-average exercise price of $8.1717 per
share;
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,726,814 additional shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan as of September 30, 2009; provided, however, that
immediately upon the signing of the underwriting agreement for
this offering, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will terminate so
that no further awards may be granted under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan and the shares then remaining and reserved for
future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan shall
become reserved for issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan; and
|
|
|
|
the shares reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and up to 300,000 additional shares of common
stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan, as well as any automatic
increases in the number of shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance under each of these benefit plans, which will
become effective immediately upon the signing of the
underwriting agreement for this offering.
|
Unless we specifically state otherwise, the share information in
this prospectus is as of September 30, 2009 and reflects or
assumes:
|
|
|
|
|
that our reincorporation in Delaware has been completed;
|
|
|
|
the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our
convertible preferred stock into an aggregate of
21,176,533 shares of common stock effective immediately
prior to the closing of this offering;
|
|
|
|
that our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
which we will file in connection with the completion of this
offering, is in effect; and
|
|
|
|
no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option to
purchase up to an
additional shares
of common stock.
|
4
SUMMARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes our consolidated financial data.
We have derived the following summary of our consolidated
statements of operations data for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 from our audited consolidated
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The
consolidated statements of operations data for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and consolidated balance
sheet data as of September 30, 2009 have been derived from
our unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that should be expected in
the future and our interim results are not necessarily
indicative of the results that should be expected for the full
fiscal year. The summary of our consolidated financial data set
forth below should be read together with our consolidated
financial statements and the related notes to those statements,
as well as the sections titled Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
63,678
|
|
|
$
|
78,552
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
45,281
|
|
|
|
55,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
23,505
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
34,021
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
11,752
|
|
|
|
11,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
(4,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: 8% non-cumulative dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(5,925
|
)
|
|
|
(8,599
|
)
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
$
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
$
|
2,207
|
|
Undistributed earnings re-allocated to common stock
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders
diluted
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per
share
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,279
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per
share
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
15,131
|
|
|
|
15,381
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma basic net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,582
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma diluted net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,558
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
28,095
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
19,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
235,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
110,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
66,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
81,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma as adjusted consolidated balance sheet data gives
effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of
convertible preferred stock into shares of common stock
effective immediately prior to the closing of this offering, the
repayment of the outstanding balance of our five-year term loan
using a portion of the net proceeds of this offering and to the
sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial
public offering price of $ per
share, the midpoint of the range reflected on the cover page of
this prospectus, and after deducting the estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash
equivalents, working capital, total assets and total
shareholders equity by $ ,
assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We may also
increase or decrease the number of shares we are offering. Each
increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 shares in the number of
shares offered by us would increase (decrease) each of cash and
cash equivalents, working capital, total assets and total
shareholders equity by $ ,
assuming that the assumed initial public offering price remains
the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. The pro forma as adjusted information discussed
above is illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual
initial public offering price and other terms of this offering
determined at pricing. |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
25,197
|
|
|
$
|
24,751
|
|
|
$
|
32,570
|
|
|
$
|
(261
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,808
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
36,112
|
|
|
$
|
36,279
|
|
|
$
|
56,872
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less interest income
plus interest expense, provision for taxes, depreciation
expense, amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense
and foreign-exchange (loss) gain. Please see
Adjusted EBITDA for more information and
for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income
calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or GAAP.
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
We include Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus because
(i) we seek to manage our business to a consistent level of
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue, (ii) it is
a key basis upon which our management assesses our operating
performance, (iii) it is one of the primary metrics
investors use in evaluating Internet marketing companies,
(iv) it is a factor in the evaluation of the performance of
our management in determining compensation, and (v) it is
an element of certain maintenance covenants under our debt
agreements. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less
interest income plus interest expense, provision for taxes,
depreciation expense, amortization expense, stock-based
compensation expense and foreign-exchange (loss) gain.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure because we
believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from
period to period by excluding potential differences caused by
variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense),
tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of
changes in effective tax rates or fluctuations in permanent
differences or discrete quarterly items) and the impact of
depreciation and amortization expense on definite-lived
intangible assets. Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal
comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more
consistent basis, we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business
planning purposes, to incentivize and compensate our management
personnel and in evaluating acquisition opportunities.
In addition, we believe Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are
widely used by investors, securities analysts, ratings agencies
and other interested parties in our industry as a measure of
financial performance and debt-service capabilities. Our use of
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you
should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures for
capital equipment or other contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced
in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital
expenditure requirements for such replacements;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive
impact of issuing equity-based compensation to our management
team and employees;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest
or principal payments on our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect certain tax payments that may
represent a reduction in cash available to us; and
|
|
|
|
other companies, including companies in our industry, may
calculate Adjusted EBITDA measures differently, which reduces
their usefulness as a comparative measure.
|
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to
invest in the growth of our business. When evaluating our
performance, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other
financial performance measures, including various cash flow
metrics, net income and our other GAAP results.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure, for each of the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
|
|
8,876
|
|
|
|
13,909
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
4,837
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
36,112
|
|
|
$
|
36,279
|
|
|
$
|
56,872
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that
our business faces numerous financial and market risks,
including those described below, as well as general economic and
business risks. The following discussion provides information
concerning the material risks and uncertainties that we have
identified and believe may adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Before you decide
whether to invest in our common stock, you should carefully
consider these risks and uncertainties, together with all of the
other information included in this prospectus.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
We
operate in an immature industry and have a relatively new
business model, which makes it difficult to evaluate our
business and prospects.
We derive nearly all of our revenue from the sale of online
marketing and media services, which is an immature industry that
has undergone rapid and dramatic changes in its short history.
The industry in which we operate is characterized by
rapidly-changing Internet media, evolving industry standards,
and changing user and client demands. Our business model is also
evolving and is distinct from many other companies in our
industry, and it may not be successful. As a result of these
factors, the future revenue and income potential of our business
is uncertain. Although we have experienced significant revenue
growth in recent periods, we may not be able to sustain current
revenue levels or growth rates. Any evaluation of our business
and our prospects must be considered in light of these factors
and the risks and uncertainties often encountered by companies
in an immature industry with an evolving business model such as
ours. Some of these risks and uncertainties relate to our
ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain and expand client relationships;
|
|
|
|
sustain and increase the number of visitors to our websites;
|
|
|
|
sustain and grow relationships with third-party website
publishers and other sources of web visitors;
|
|
|
|
manage our expanding operations and implement and improve our
operational, financial and management controls;
|
|
|
|
raise capital at attractive costs, or at all;
|
|
|
|
acquire and integrate websites and other businesses;
|
|
|
|
successfully expand our footprint in our existing client
verticals and enter new client verticals;
|
|
|
|
respond effectively to competition and potential negative
effects of competition on profit margins;
|
|
|
|
attract and retain qualified management, employees and
independent service providers;
|
|
|
|
successfully introduce new processes and technologies and
upgrade our existing technologies and services;
|
|
|
|
protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property
rights; and
|
|
|
|
respond to government regulations relating to the Internet,
personal data protection, email, software technologies and other
aspects of our business.
|
If we are unable to address these risks, our business, results
of operations and prospects could suffer.
If we
do not effectively manage our growth, our operating performance
will suffer and we may lose clients.
We have experienced rapid growth in our operations and operating
locations, and we expect to experience continued growth in our
business, both through acquisitions and internal growth. This
growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant
demands on our management and our operational and financial
infrastructure. In particular, continued rapid growth and
acquisitions may make it more difficult for us to accomplish the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
successfully scale our technology to accommodate a larger
business and integrate acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
maintain our standing with key vendors, including Internet
search companies and third-party website publishers;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
maintain our client service standards; and
|
|
|
|
develop and improve our operational, financial and management
controls and maintain adequate reporting systems and procedures.
|
In addition, our personnel, systems, procedures and controls may
be inadequate to support our future operations. The improvements
required to manage our growth will require us to make
significant expenditures, expand, train and manage our employee
base and allocate valuable management resources. If we fail to
effectively manage our growth, our operating performance will
suffer and we may lose clients, third-party website publishers
and key personnel.
We
depend upon Internet search companies to attract a significant
portion of the visitors to our websites, and any change in the
search companies search algorithms or perception of us or
our industry could result in our websites being listed less
prominently in either paid or algorithmic search result
listings, in which case the number of visitors to our websites
and our revenue could decline.
We depend in significant part on various Internet search
companies, such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!, and other
search websites to direct a significant number of visitors to
our websites to provide our online marketing services to our
clients. Search websites typically provide two types of search
results, algorithmic and paid listings. Algorithmic, or organic,
listings are determined and displayed solely by a set of
formulas designed by search companies. Paid listings can be
purchased and then are displayed if particular words are
included in a users Internet search. Placement in paid
listings is generally not determined solely on the bid price,
but also takes into account the search engines assessment
of the quality of website featured in the paid listing and other
factors. We rely on both algorithmic and paid search results, as
well as advertising on other websites, to direct a substantial
share of the visitors to our websites.
Our ability to maintain the number of visitors to our websites
from search websites and other websites is not entirely within
our control. For example, Internet search websites frequently
revise their algorithms in an attempt to optimize their search
result listings or to maintain their internal standards and
strategies. Changes in the algorithms could cause our websites
to receive less favorable placements, which could reduce the
number of users who visit our websites. We have experienced
fluctuations in the search result rankings for a number of our
websites. We may make decisions that are suboptimal regarding
the purchase of paid listings, which could also reduce the
number of visitors to our websites, or the placement of
advertisements on other websites and pricing, which could
increase our costs to attract such visitors. Our approaches may
be deemed similar to those of our competitors and others in our
industry that Internet search websites may consider to be
unsuitable or unattractive. Internet search websites could deem
our content to be unsuitable or below standards or less
attractive or worthy than those of other or competing websites.
In either such case, our websites may receive less favorable
placement. Any reduction in the number of visitors to our
websites would negatively affect our ability to earn revenue. If
visits to our websites decrease, we may need to resort to more
costly sources to replace lost visitors, and such increased
expense could adversely affect our business and profitability.
Our
future growth depends in part on our ability to identify and
complete acquisitions.
Our growth over the past several years is in significant part
due to the large number of acquisitions we have completed. Since
the beginning of fiscal year 2007, we have completed over 100
acquisitions of third-party website publishing businesses and
other businesses that are complementary to our own for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $189.5 million.
We intend to pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses and
technologies to expand our capabilities, client base and media.
We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide
array of potential strategic transactions. However, we may not
be successful in identifying suitable acquisition candidates or
be able to complete acquisitions of such candidates. In
addition, we may not be able to obtain financing on favorable
terms, or at all, to fund acquisitions that we may wish to
pursue.
10
Any
acquisitions that we complete will involve a number of risks. If
we are unable to address and resolve these risks successfully,
such acquisitions could harm our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The anticipated benefit of any acquisitions that we complete may
not materialize. In addition, the process of integrating
acquired businesses or technologies may create unforeseen
operating difficulties and expenditures. Some of the areas where
we may face acquisition-related risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of management time and potential business disruptions;
|
|
|
|
expenses, distractions and potential claims resulting from
acquisitions, whether or not they are completed;
|
|
|
|
retaining and integrating employees from any businesses we may
acquire;
|
|
|
|
issuance of dilutive equity securities, incurrence of debt or
reduction in cash balances;
|
|
|
|
integrating various accounting, management, information, human
resource and other systems to permit effective management;
|
|
|
|
incurring possible impairment charges, contingent liabilities,
amortization expense or write-offs of goodwill;
|
|
|
|
difficulties integrating and supporting acquired products or
technologies;
|
|
|
|
unexpected capital expenditure requirements;
|
|
|
|
insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated
with acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
underperformance problems associated with acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
becoming involved in acquisition-related litigation.
|
Foreign acquisitions would involve risks in addition to those
mentioned above, including those related to integration of
operations across different cultures and languages, currency
risks and the particular economic, political, administrative and
management, and regulatory risks associated with specific
countries. We may not be able to address these risks
successfully, or at all, without incurring significant costs,
delay or other operating problems. Our inability to resolve such
risks could harm our business and results of operations.
A
substantial portion of our revenue is generated from a limited
number of clients and, if we lose a major client, our revenue
will decrease and our business and prospects would be adversely
impacted.
A substantial portion of our revenue is generated from a limited
number of clients. Our top three clients accounted for 32% and
28% of our net revenue for the fiscal year 2009 and the first
three months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. Our clients can
generally terminate their contracts with us at any time, with
limited prior notice or penalty. DeVry Inc., our largest client,
accounted for approximately 19% and 13% of our net revenue for
fiscal year 2009 and the first three months of fiscal year 2010,
respectively. DeVry has recently retained an advertising agency
and has reduced its purchases of leads from us. DeVry and other
clients may reduce their current level of business with us,
leading to lower revenue. We expect that a limited number of
clients will continue to account for a significant percentage of
our revenue, and the loss of, or material reduction in, their
marketing spending with us could decrease our revenue and harm
our business.
We are
dependent on two market verticals for a majority of our
revenue.
To date, we have generated a majority of our revenue from
clients in our education vertical. We expect that a majority of
our revenue in fiscal year 2010 will be generated from clients
in our education and financial services verticals. A downturn in
economic or market conditions adversely affecting the education
industry or the financial services industry would negatively
impact our business and financial condition. Over the past year,
education marketing spending has remained relatively stable, but
this stability may not continue. Marketing budgets for clients
in our education vertical are impacted by a number of factors,
including the availability of student financial aid, the
regulation of for-profit financial institutions and economic
conditions. Over the past year, some segments of the financial
services industry, particularly mortgages, credit cards and
deposits, have seen declines in marketing budgets given the
difficult market conditions. These declines may
11
continue or worsen. In addition, the education and financial
services industries are highly regulated. Changes in regulations
or government actions may negatively impact our clients
marketing practices and budgets and, therefore, adversely affect
our financial results.
The United States Higher Education Act, administered by the
U.S. Department of Education, provides that to be eligible
to participate in Federal student financial aid programs, an
educational institution must enter into a program participation
agreement with the Secretary of the Department of Education. The
agreement includes a number of conditions with which an
institution must comply to be granted initial and continuing
eligibility to participate. Among those conditions is a
prohibition on institutions providing any commission, bonus, or
other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success
in securing enrollments to any individual or entity engaged in
recruiting or admission activities. The regulations promulgated
under the Higher Education Act specify a number of types of
compensation, or safe harbors, that do not
constitute incentive compensation in violation of this
agreement. One of these safe harbors permits an institution to
award incentive compensation for Internet-based recruitment and
admission activities that provide information about the
institution to prospective students, refer prospective students
to the institution, or permit prospective students to apply for
admission online. The U.S. Department of Education is currently
engaged in a negotiated rulemaking process in which it has
suggested repealing all existing safe harbors regarding
incentive compensation in recruiting, including the Internet
safe harbor. While we do not believe that compensation for
services constitutes incentive compensation under the Higher
Education Act, the elimination of the safe harbor could create
uncertainty for our education clients and impact the way in
which we are paid by our clients and, accordingly, could reduce
the amount of net revenue we generate from the education client
vertical.
In addition, some of our clients have had and may in the future
have issues regarding their academic accreditation, which can
adversely affect their ability to offer certain degree programs.
If any of our significant education clients lose their
accreditation, they may reduce or eliminate their marketing
spending, which could adversely affect our financial results.
If we
are unable to retain the members of our management team or
attract and retain qualified management team members in the
future, our business and growth could suffer.
Our success and future growth depend, to a significant degree,
on the continued contributions of the members of our management
team. Each member of our management team is an at-will employee
and may voluntarily terminate his or her employment with us at
any time with minimal notice. We also may need to hire
additional management team members to adequately manage our
growing business. We may not be able to retain or identify and
attract additional qualified management team members.
Competition for experienced management-level personnel in our
industry is intense. Qualified individuals are in high demand,
particularly in the Internet marketing industry, and we may
incur significant costs to attract and retain them. If we lose
the services of any of our senior managers or if we are unable
to attract and retain additional qualified senior managers, our
business and growth could suffer.
We
need to hire and retain additional qualified personnel to grow
and manage our business. If we are unable to attract and retain
qualified personnel, our business and growth could be seriously
harmed.
Our performance depends on the talents and efforts of our
employees. Our future success will depend on our ability to
attract, retain and motivate highly skilled personnel in all
areas of our organization and, in particular, in our
engineering/technology, sales and marketing, media, finance and
legal/regulatory teams. We plan to continue to grow our business
and will need to hire additional personnel to support this
growth. We have found it difficult from time to time to locate
and hire suitable personnel. If we experience similar
difficulties in the future, our growth may be hindered.
Qualified individuals are in high demand, particularly in the
Internet marketing industry, and we may incur significant costs
to attract and retain them. Many of our employees have also
become, or will soon become, substantially vested in their stock
option grants. Employees may be more likely to leave us
following our initial public offering as a result of the
establishment of a public market for our common stock. If we are
unable to attract and retain the personnel we need to succeed,
our business and growth could be harmed.
12
We
depend on third-party website publishers for a significant
portion of our visitors, and any decline in the supply of media
available through these websites or increase in the price of
this media could cause our revenue to decline or our cost to
reach visitors to increase.
A significant portion of our revenue is attributable to visitors
originating from advertising placements that we purchase on
third-party websites. In many instances, website publishers can
change the advertising inventory they make available to us at
any time and, therefore, impact our revenue. In addition,
website publishers may place significant restrictions on our
offerings. These restrictions may prohibit advertisements from
specific clients or specific industries, or restrict the use of
certain creative content or formats. If a website publisher
decides not to make advertising inventory available to us, or
decides to demand a higher revenue share or places significant
restrictions on the use of such inventory, we may not be able to
find advertising inventory from other websites that satisfy our
requirements in a timely and cost-effective manner. In addition,
the number of competing online marketing service providers and
advertisers that acquire inventory from websites continues to
increase. Consolidation of Internet advertising networks and
website publishers could eventually lead to a concentration of
desirable inventory on a small number of websites or networks,
which could limit the supply of inventory available to us or
increase the price of inventory to us. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to acquire advertising inventory that meets our
clients performance, price and quality requirements. If
any of these things occur, our revenue could decline or our
operating costs may increase.
We
have incurred a significant amount of debt, which may limit our
ability to fund general corporate requirements and obtain
additional financing, limit our flexibility in responding to
business opportunities and competitive developments and increase
our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry
conditions.
We have an outstanding term loan with a principal balance of
approximately $27.8 million as of September 30, 2009
and a revolving credit facility pursuant to which we can borrow
up to an additional $100.0 million. As of
September 30, 2009, we had drawn $14.8 million from
our revolving credit facility. We also had outstanding notes to
sellers arising from numerous acquisitions in the total
principal amount of $26.4 million. As a result of our debt:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not have sufficient liquidity to respond to business
opportunities, competitive developments and adverse economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
we may not have sufficient liquidity to fund all of these costs
if our revenue declines or costs increase; and
|
|
|
|
we may not have sufficient funds to repay the principal balance
of our debt when due.
|
Our debt obligations may also impair our ability to obtain
additional financing, if needed. Our indebtedness is secured by
substantially all of our assets, leaving us with limited
collateral for additional financing. Moreover, the terms of our
indebtedness restrict our ability to take certain actions,
including the incurrence of additional indebtedness, mergers and
acquisitions, investments and asset sales. In addition, even if
we are able to raise needed equity financing, we are required to
use a portion of the net proceeds of any equity financing to
repay the outstanding balance of our term loan. A failure to pay
interest or indebtedness when due could result in a variety of
adverse consequences, including the acceleration of our
indebtedness. In such a situation, it is unlikely that we would
be able to fulfill our obligations under our credit facilities
or repay the accelerated indebtedness or otherwise cover our
costs.
The
severe economic downturn in the United States poses additional
risks to our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The United States has experienced, and is continuing to
experience, a severe economic downturn. The credit crisis,
deterioration of global economies, rising unemployment and
reduced equity valuations all create risks that could harm our
business. If macroeconomic conditions worsen, we are not able to
predict the impact such worsening conditions will have on the
online marketing industry in general, and our results of
operations specifically. Clients in particular verticals such as
financial services, particularly mortgage, credit cards and
deposits, small- to medium-sized business customers and home
services are facing very difficult conditions and their
marketing spend has been negatively affected. These conditions
could also damage our business
13
opportunities in existing markets, and reduce our revenue and
profitability. While the effect of these and related conditions
poses widespread risk across our business, we believe that it
may particularly affect our efforts in the mortgage, credit
cards and deposits, small- to medium-sized business and home
services verticals, due to reduced availability of credit for
households and business and reduced household disposable income.
Economic conditions may not improve or may worsen.
Our
operating results have fluctuated in the past and may do so in
the future, which makes our results of operations difficult to
predict and could cause our operating results to fall short of
analysts and investors expectations.
While we have experienced continued revenue growth, our prior
quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated due to
changes in our business, our industry and the general economic
climate. Similarly, our future operating results may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter due to a variety of
factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our fluctuating
results could cause our performance to be below the expectations
of securities analysts and investors, causing the price of our
common stock to fall. Because our business is changing and
evolving, our historical operating results may not be useful to
you in predicting our future operating results. Factors that may
increase the volatility of our operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in demand and pricing for our services;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies, the pricing policies of our
competitors, or the pricing of Internet advertising or media;
|
|
|
|
the addition of new clients or the loss of existing clients;
|
|
|
|
changes in our clients advertising agencies or the
marketing strategies our clients or their advertising agencies
employ;
|
|
|
|
changes in the economic prospects of our clients or the economy
generally, which could alter current or prospective
clients spending priorities, or could increase the time or
costs required to complete sales with clients;
|
|
|
|
changes in the availability of Internet advertising or the cost
to reach Internet visitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in the placement of our websites on search engines;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new product or service offerings by our
competitors; and
|
|
|
|
costs related to acquisitions of businesses or technologies.
|
Our
quarterly revenue and operating results may fluctuate
significantly from quarter to quarter due to seasonal
fluctuations in advertising spending.
The timing of our revenue, particularly from our education
client vertical, is affected by seasonal factors. For example,
the first quarter of each fiscal year typically demonstrates
seasonal strength and our second fiscal quarter typically
demonstrates seasonal weakness. In our second fiscal quarter,
our education clients often take fewer leads due to holiday
staffing and lower availability of lead supply caused by higher
media pricing for some forms of media during the holiday period,
causing our revenue to be sequentially lower. Our fluctuating
results could cause our performance to be below the expectations
of securities analysts and investors, causing the price of our
common stock to fall. To the extent our rate of growth slows, we
expect that the seasonality in our business may become more
apparent and may in the future cause our operating results to
fluctuate to a greater extent.
We may
need additional capital in the future to meet our financial
obligations and to pursue our business objectives. Additional
capital may not be available or may not be available on
favorable terms and our business and financial condition could
therefore be adversely affected.
While we anticipate the net proceeds of this offering, together
with availability under our existing credit facility, cash
balances and cash from operations, will be sufficient to fund
our operations for at least the next 12 months, we may need
to raise additional capital to fund operations in the future or
to finance acquisitions. If we seek to raise additional capital
in order to meet various objectives, including developing future
technologies and services, increasing working capital, acquiring
businesses and responding to competitive pressures, capital may
not
14
be available on favorable terms or may not be available at all.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of our credit facility, we
are required to use a portion of the net proceeds of any equity
financing, including this offering, to repay the outstanding
balance of our term loan. Lack of sufficient capital resources
could significantly limit our ability to take advantage of
business and strategic opportunities. Any additional capital
raised through the sale of equity or debt securities with an
equity component would dilute our stock ownership. If adequate
additional funds are not available, we may be required to delay,
reduce the scope of, or eliminate material parts of our business
strategy, including potential additional acquisitions or
development of new technologies.
If we
fail to compete effectively against other online marketing and
media companies and other competitors, we could lose clients and
our revenue may decline.
The market for online marketing is intensely competitive. We
expect this competition to continue to increase in the future.
We perceive only limited barriers to entry to the online
marketing industry. We compete both for clients and for limited
high quality advertising inventory. We compete for clients on
the basis of a number of factors, including return on marketing
expenditures, price, and client service.
We compete with Internet and traditional media companies for a
share of clients overall marketing budgets, including:
|
|
|
|
|
online marketing or media services providers such as Monster
Worldwide in the education vertical and Bankrate in financial
services;
|
|
|
|
offline and online advertising agencies;
|
|
|
|
major Internet portals and search engine companies with
advertising networks such as Google, Yahoo!, MSN, and AOL;
|
|
|
|
other online marketing service providers, including online
affiliate advertising networks and industry-specific portals or
lead generation companies;
|
|
|
|
website publishers with their own sales forces that sell their
online marketing services directly to clients;
|
|
|
|
in-house marketing groups at current or potential clients;
|
|
|
|
offline direct marketing agencies; and
|
|
|
|
television, radio and print companies.
|
Competition for web traffic among websites and search engines,
as well as competition with traditional media companies, could
result in significant price pressure, declining margins,
reductions in revenue and loss of market share. In addition, as
we continue to expand the scope of our services, we may compete
with a greater number of websites, clients and traditional media
companies across an increasing range of different services,
including in vertical markets where competitors may have
advantages in expertise, brand recognition and other areas.
Large Internet companies with brand recognition, such as Google,
Yahoo!, MSN, and AOL, have significant numbers of direct sales
personnel and substantial proprietary advertising inventory and
web traffic that provide a significant competitive advantage and
have significant impact on pricing for Internet advertising and
web traffic. The trend toward consolidation in the Internet
advertising arena may also affect pricing and availability of
advertising inventory and web traffic. Many of our current and
potential competitors also enjoy other competitive advantages
over us, such as longer operating histories, greater brand
recognition, larger client bases, greater access to advertising
inventory on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater
financial, technical and marketing resources. As a result, we
may not be able to compete successfully. If we fail to deliver
results that are superior to those that other online marketing
service providers achieve, we could lose clients and our revenue
may decline.
If the
market for online marketing services fails to continue to
develop, our future growth may be limited and our revenue may
decrease.
The online marketing services market is relatively new and
rapidly evolving, and it uses different measurements than
traditional media to gauge its effectiveness. Some of our
current or potential clients have little or no experience using
the Internet for advertising and marketing purposes and have
allocated only
15
limited portions of their advertising and marketing budgets to
the Internet. The adoption of Internet advertising, particularly
by those entities that have historically relied upon traditional
media for advertising, requires the acceptance of a new way of
conducting business, exchanging information and evaluating new
advertising and marketing technologies and services. In
particular, we are dependent on our clients adoption of
new metrics to measure the success of online marketing
campaigns. We may also experience resistance from traditional
advertising agencies who may be advising our clients. We cannot
assure you that the market for online marketing services will
continue to grow. If the market for online marketing services
fails to continue to develop or develops more slowly than we
anticipate, our ability to grow our business may be limited and
our revenue may decrease.
Third-party
website publishers can engage in unauthorized or unlawful acts
that could subject us to significant liability or cause us to
lose clients.
We generate a significant portion of our web visitors from media
advertising that we purchase from third-party website
publishers. Some of these publishers are authorized to display
our clients brands, subject to contractual restrictions.
In the past, some of our third-party website publishers have
engaged in activities that certain of our clients have viewed as
harmful to their brands, such as displaying outdated
descriptions of a clients offerings or outdated logos. Any
activity by publishers that clients view as potentially damaging
to their brands can harm our relationship with the client and
cause the client to terminate its relationship with us,
resulting in a loss of revenue. In addition, the law is
unsettled on the extent of liability that an advertiser in our
position has for the activities of third-party website
publishers. We could be subject to costly litigation and, if we
are unsuccessful in defending ourselves, damages for the
unauthorized or unlawful acts of third-party website publishers.
Poor
perception of our business or industry as a result of the
actions of third parties could harm our reputation and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our business is dependent on attracting a large number of
visitors to our websites and providing leads and clicks to our
clients, which depends in part on our reputation within the
industry and with our clients. There are companies within our
industry that regularly engage in activities that our
clients customers may view as unlawful or inappropriate.
These activities, such as spyware or deceptive promotions, by
third parties may be seen by clients as characteristic of
participants in our industry and, therefore, may have an adverse
effect on the reputation of all participants in our industry,
including us. Any damage to our reputation, including from
publicity from legal proceedings against us or companies that
work within our industry, governmental proceedings, consumer
class action litigation, or the disclosure of information
security breaches or private information misuse, could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Because
many of our client contracts can be cancelled by the client with
little prior notice or penalty, the cancellation of one or more
contracts could result in an immediate decline in our
revenue.
We derive our revenue from contracts with our Internet marketing
clients, most of which are cancelable with little or no prior
notice. In addition, these contracts do not contain penalty
provisions for cancellation before the end of the contract term.
The non-renewal, renegotiation, cancellation, or deferral of
large contracts, or a number of contracts that in the aggregate
account for a significant amount of our revenue, is difficult to
anticipate and could result in an immediate decline in our
revenue.
Unauthorized
access to or accidental disclosure of consumer
personally-identifiable information that we collect may cause us
to incur significant expenses and may negatively impact our
credibility and business.
There is growing concern over the security of personal
information transmitted over the Internet, consumer identity
theft and user privacy. Despite our implementation of security
measures, our computer systems may be susceptible to electronic
or physical computer break-ins, viruses and other disruptions
and security breaches. Any perceived or actual unauthorized
disclosure of personally-identifiable information regarding
website visitors, whether through breach of our network by an
unauthorized party, employee theft, misuse or error or
otherwise, could harm our reputation, impair our ability to
attract website visitors and attract and retain our clients, or
subject
16
us to claims or litigation arising from damages suffered by
consumers, and thereby harm our business and operating results.
In addition, we could incur significant costs in complying with
the multitude of state, federal and foreign laws regarding the
unauthorized disclosure of personal information.
If we
do not adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our
competitive position and business may suffer.
Our ability to compete effectively depends upon our proprietary
systems and technology. We rely on trade secret, trademark and
copyright law, confidentiality agreements, technical measures
and patents to protect our proprietary rights. We currently have
one patent application pending in the United States and no
issued patents. Effective trade secret, copyright, trademark and
patent protection may not be available in all countries where we
currently operate or in which we may operate in the future. Some
of our systems and technologies are not covered by any
copyright, patent or patent application. We cannot guarantee
that: (i) our intellectual property rights will provide
competitive advantages to us; (ii) our ability to assert
our intellectual property rights against potential competitors
or to settle current or future disputes will not be limited by
our agreements with third parties; (iii) our intellectual
property rights will be enforced in jurisdictions where
competition may be intense or where legal protection may be
weak; (iv) any of the patents, trademarks, copyrights,
trade secrets or other intellectual property rights that we
presently employ in our business will not lapse or be
invalidated, circumvented, challenged, or abandoned;
(v) competitors will not design around our protected
systems and technology; or (vi) that we will not lose the
ability to assert our intellectual property rights against
others.
We are a party to a number of third-party intellectual property
license agreements and in the future, may need to obtain
additional licenses or renew existing license agreements. We are
unable to predict with certainty whether these license
agreements can be obtained or renewed on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all.
We have from time to time become aware of third parties who we
believe may have infringed on our intellectual property rights.
The use of our intellectual property rights by others could
reduce any competitive advantage we have developed and cause us
to lose clients, third-party website publishers or otherwise
harm our business. Policing unauthorized use of our proprietary
rights can be difficult and costly. In addition, litigation,
while it may be necessary to enforce or protect our intellectual
property rights or to defend litigation brought against us,
could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
management attention and could adversely affect our business,
even if we are successful on the merits.
Confidentiality
agreements with employees, consultants and others may not
adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other
proprietary information.
We have devoted substantial resources to the development of our
proprietary systems and technology. In order to protect our
proprietary systems and technology, we enter into
confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants,
independent contractors and other advisors. These agreements may
not effectively prevent unauthorized disclosure of confidential
information or unauthorized parties from copying aspects of our
services or obtaining and using information that we regard as
proprietary. Moreover, these agreements may not provide an
adequate remedy in the event of such unauthorized disclosures of
confidential information and we cannot assure you that our
rights under such agreements will be enforceable. In addition,
others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary
information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade
secret rights against such parties. Costly and time-consuming
litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope
of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain
trade secret protection could reduce any competitive advantage
we have and cause us to lose clients, publishers or otherwise
harm our business.
Third
parties may sue us for intellectual property infringement which,
if successful, could require us to pay significant damages or
curtail our offerings.
We cannot be certain that our internally-developed or acquired
systems and technologies do not and will not infringe the
intellectual property rights of others. In addition, we license
content, software and other intellectual property rights from
third parties and may be subject to claims of infringement if
such parties do not possess the necessary intellectual property
rights to the products they license to us. We have in the past
and may in the
17
future be subject to legal proceedings and claims that we have
infringed the patent or other intellectual property rights of a
third-party. These claims sometimes involve patent holding
companies or other adverse patent owners who have no relevant
product revenue and against whom our own patents, if any, may
therefore provide little or no deterrence. In addition, third
parties have asserted and may in the future assert intellectual
property infringement claims against our clients, which we have
agreed in certain circumstances to indemnify and defend against
such claims. Any intellectual property related infringement
claims, whether or not meritorious, could result in costly
litigation and could divert management resources and attention.
Moreover, should we be found liable for infringement, we may be
required to enter into licensing agreements, if available on
acceptable terms or at all, pay substantial damages, or limit or
curtail our systems and technologies. Moreover, we may need to
redesign some of our systems and technologies to avoid future
infringement liability. Any of the foregoing could prevent us
from competing effectively and increase our costs.
Additionally, the laws relating to use of trademarks on the
Internet are currently unsettled, particularly as they apply to
search engine functionality. For example, other Internet
marketing and search companies have been sued in the past for
trademark infringement and other intellectual property-related
claims for the display of ads or search results in response to
user queries that include trademarked terms. The outcomes of
these lawsuits have differed from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
For this reason, it is conceivable that certain of our
activities could expose us to trademark infringement, unfair
competition, misappropriation or other intellectual property
related claims which could be costly to defend and result in
substantial damages or otherwise limit or curtail our
activities, and adversely affect our business or prospects.
Our
proprietary technologies may include design or performance
defects and may not achieve their intended results, either of
which could impair our future revenue growth.
Our proprietary technologies are relatively new, and they may
contain design or performance defects that are not yet apparent.
The use of our proprietary technologies may not achieve the
intended results as effectively as other technologies that exist
now or may be introduced by our competitors, in which case our
business could be harmed.
If we
are unable to price our services appropriately, our margins and
revenue may decline.
Our clients purchase our services according to a variety of
pricing formulae, the vast majority of which are based on pay
for performance, meaning clients pay only after we have
delivered the desired result to them. Regardless of how a given
client pays us, we ordinarily pay the vast majority of the costs
associated with delivering our services to our clients according
to contracts and other arrangements that do not always condition
payment to vendors upon receipt of payments from our clients.
This means we typically pay for the costs of providing our
marketing services before we receive payment from clients.
Additionally, certain of our marketing services costs are highly
variable and may fluctuate significantly during each calendar
month. Accordingly, we run the risk of not being able to recover
the entire cost of our services from clients if pricing or other
terms negotiated prior to the performance of services prove less
than the cost of performing such services. We have experienced
situations in the past where we incurred losses in the delivery
of our services to specific clients. If we are unable to avoid
recurrence of similar situations in the future through
negotiation of profitable pricing and other terms, our results
of operations will suffer.
If we
fail to keep pace with rapidly-changing technologies and
industry standards, we could lose clients or advertising
inventory and our results of operations may
suffer.
The business lines in which we currently compete are
characterized by rapidly-changing Internet media and marketing
standards, changing technologies, frequent new product and
service introductions, and changing user and client demands. The
introduction of new technologies and services embodying new
technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and
practices could render our existing technologies and services
obsolete and unmarketable or require unanticipated investments
in technology. Our future success will depend in part on our
ability to adapt to these rapidly-changing Internet media
formats and other technologies. We will need to enhance our
existing technologies and services and develop and introduce new
technologies and services to address our clients changing
demands. If we fail to adapt successfully to such developments
or
18
timely introduce new technologies and services, we could lose
clients, our expenses could increase and we could lose
advertising inventory.
Changes
in government regulation and industry standards applicable to
the Internet and our business could decrease demand for our
technologies and services or increase our costs.
Laws and regulations that apply to Internet communications,
commerce and advertising are becoming more prevalent. These
regulations could increase the costs of conducting business on
the Internet and could decrease demand for our technologies and
services.
In the United States, federal and state laws have been enacted
regarding copyrights, sending of unsolicited commercial email,
user privacy, search engines, Internet tracking technologies,
direct marketing, data security, childrens privacy,
pricing, sweepstakes, promotions, intellectual property
ownership and infringement, trade secrets, export of encryption
technology, taxation and acceptable content and quality of
goods. Other laws and regulations may be adopted in the future.
Laws and regulations, including those related to privacy and use
of personal information, are changing rapidly outside the United
States as well which may make compliance with such laws and
regulations difficult and which may negatively affect our
ability to expand internationally. This legislation could:
(i) hinder growth in the use of the Internet generally;
(ii) decrease the acceptance of the Internet as a
communications, commercial and advertising medium;
(iii) reduce our revenue; (iv) increase our operating
expenses; or (v) expose us to significant liabilities.
The laws governing the Internet remain largely unsettled, even
in areas where there has been some legislative action. While we
actively monitor this changing legal and regulatory landscape to
stay abreast of changes in the laws and regulations applicable
to our business, we are not certain how our business might be
affected by the application of existing laws governing issues
such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other
intellectual property issues, libel, obscenity and export or
import matters to the Internet advertising industry. The vast
majority of such laws were adopted prior to the advent of the
Internet. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the
unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes
in laws intended to address such issues could create uncertainty
in the Internet market. It may take years to determine how
existing laws apply to the Internet and Internet marketing. Such
uncertainty makes it difficult to predict costs and could reduce
demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business
as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery
costs.
In particular, a number of U.S. federal laws impact our
business. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, is
intended, in part, to limit the liability of eligible online
service providers for listing or linking to third-party websites
that include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights.
Portions of the Communications Decency Act, or CDA, are intended
to provide statutory protections to online service providers who
distribute third-party content. We rely on the protections
provided by both the DMCA and CDA in conducting our business. In
addition, the United States Higher Education Act provides that
to be eligible to participate in Federal student financial aid
programs, an educational institution must enter into a program
participation agreement with the Secretary of the Department of
Education. The agreement includes a number of conditions with
which an institution must comply to be granted initial and
continuing eligibility to participate. Among those conditions is
a prohibition on institutions providing any commission, bonus,
or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on
success in securing enrollments to any individual or entity
engaged in recruiting or admission activities. The regulations
promulgated under the Higher Education Act specify a number of
types of compensation, or safe harbors, that do not
constitute incentive compensation in violation of this
agreement. One of these safe harbors permits an institution to
award incentive compensation for Internet-based recruitment and
admission activities that provide information about the
institution to prospective students, refer prospective students
to the institution, or permit prospective students to apply for
admission online. The U.S. Department of Education is
current engaged in a negotiated rulemaking process in which it
has suggested repealing all existing safe harbors regarding
incentive compensation in recruiting, including the Internet
safe harbor. Any changes in these laws or judicial
interpretations narrowing their protections will subject us to
greater risk of liability and may increase our costs of
compliance with these regulations or limit our ability to
operate certain lines of business.
19
The financial services, education and medical industries are
highly regulated and our marketing activities on behalf of our
clients in those industries are also regulated. For example, our
mortgage websites and marketing services we offer are subject to
various federal, state and local laws, including state mortgage
broker licensing laws, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair
acts and practices, and federal and state advertising laws. Any
failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject
us to revocation of required licenses, civil, criminal or
administrative liability, damage to our reputation or changes to
or limitations on the conduct of our business. Any of the
foregoing could cause our business, operations and financial
condition to suffer.
New
tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce may
adversely affect the commercial use of our marketing services
and our financial results.
Due to the global nature of the Internet, it is possible that,
although our services and the Internet transmissions related to
them originate in California and Nevada, and in some cases,
England, governments of other states or foreign countries might
attempt to regulate our transmissions or levy sales, income or
other taxes relating to our activities. We have experienced
certain states taking expansive positions with regard to their
taxation of our services. Tax authorities at the international,
federal, state and local levels are currently reviewing the
appropriate tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet
commerce. New or revised state tax regulations may subject us or
our affiliates to additional state sales, income and other
taxes. We cannot predict the effect of current attempts to
impose sales, income or other taxes on commerce over the
Internet. New or revised taxes and, in particular, sales taxes,
would likely increase the cost of doing business online and
decrease the attractiveness of advertising and selling goods and
services over the Internet. New taxes could also create
significant increases in internal costs necessary to capture
data, and collect and remit taxes. Any of these events could
have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Limitations
on our ability to collect and use data derived from user
activities could significantly diminish the value of our
services and cause us to lose clients and revenue.
When a user visits our websites, we use technologies, including
cookies, to collect information such as the
users Internet Protocol, or IP, address, offerings
delivered by us that have been previously viewed by the user and
responses by the user to those offerings. In order to determine
the effectiveness of a marketing campaign and to determine how
to modify the campaign, we need to access and analyze this
information. The use of cookies has been the subject of
regulatory scrutiny and users are able to block or delete
cookies from their browser. Periodically, certain of our clients
and publishers seek to prohibit or limit our collection or use
of this data. Interruptions, failures or defects in our data
collection systems, as well as privacy concerns regarding the
collection of user data, could also limit our ability to analyze
data from our clients marketing campaigns. This risk is
heightened when we deliver marketing services to clients in the
financial and medical services client verticals. If our access
to data is limited in the future, we may be unable to provide
effective technologies and services to clients and we may lose
clients and revenue.
As a
creator and a distributor of Internet content, we face potential
liability and expenses for legal claims based on the nature and
content of the materials that we create or distribute. If we are
required to pay damages or expenses in connection with these
legal claims, our operating results and business may be
harmed.
We create original content for our websites and marketing
messages and distribute third-party content on our websites and
in our marketing messages. As a creator and distributor of
original content and third-party provided content, we face
potential liability based on a variety of theories, including
defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement or
other legal theories based on the nature, creation or
distribution of this information. It is also possible that our
website visitors could make claims against us for losses
incurred in reliance upon information provided on our websites.
In addition, as the number of users of forums and social media
features on our websites increases, we could be exposed to
liability in connection with material posted to our websites by
users and other third parties. These claims, whether brought in
the United States or abroad, could divert management time and
attention away from our business and result in significant costs
to
20
investigate and defend, regardless of the merit of these claims.
In addition, if we become subject to these types of claims and
are not successful in our defense, we may be forced to pay
substantial damages.
Wireless
devices and mobile phones are increasingly being used to access
the Internet, and our online marketing services may not be as
effective when accessed through these devices, which could cause
harm to our business.
The number of people who access the Internet through devices
other than personal computers has increased substantially in the
last few years. Our online marketing services were designed for
persons accessing the Internet on a desktop or laptop computer.
The smaller screens, lower resolution graphics and less
convenient typing capabilities of these devices may make it more
difficult for visitors to respond to our offerings. In addition,
the cost of mobile advertising is relatively high and may not be
cost-effective for our services. If our services continue to be
less effective or economically attractive for clients seeking to
engage in marketing through these devices and this segment of
web traffic grows at the expense of traditional computer
Internet access, we will experience difficulty attracting
website visitors and attracting and retaining clients and our
operating results and business will be harmed.
We may
not succeed in expanding our businesses outside the United
States, which may limit our future growth.
One potential area of growth for us is in the international
markets. However, we have limited experience in marketing,
selling and supporting our services outside of the United States
and we may not be successful in introducing or marketing our
services abroad. There are risks inherent in conducting business
in international markets, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the adaptation of technologies and services to foreign
clients preferences and customs;
|
|
|
|
application of foreign laws and regulations to us, including
marketing and privacy regulations;
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign political and economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers, fluctuations in currency
exchange rates and potentially adverse tax consequences;
|
|
|
|
language barriers or cultural differences;
|
|
|
|
reduced or limited protection for intellectual property rights
in foreign jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in staffing and managing or overseeing
foreign operations; and
|
|
|
|
education of potential clients who may not be familiar with
online marketing.
|
If we are unable to successfully expand and market our services
abroad, our business and future growth may be harmed and we may
incur costs that may not lead to future revenue.
We
rely on Internet bandwidth and data center providers and other
third parties for key aspects of the process of providing
services to our clients, and any failure or interruption in the
services and products provided by these third parties could harm
our business.
We rely on third-party vendors, including data center and
Internet bandwidth providers. Any disruption in the network
access or co-location services provided by these third-party
providers or any failure of these third-party providers to
handle current or higher volumes of use could significantly harm
our business. Any financial or other difficulties our providers
face may have negative effects on our business, the nature and
extent of which we cannot predict. We exercise little control
over these third-party vendors, which increases our
vulnerability to problems with the services they provide. We
license technology and related databases from third parties to
facilitate analysis and storage of data and delivery of
offerings. We have experienced interruptions and delays in
service and availability for data centers, bandwidth and other
technologies in the past. Any errors, failures, interruptions or
delays experienced in connection with these third-party
technologies and services could adversely affect our business
and could expose us to liabilities to third parties.
21
Our systems also heavily depend on the availability of
electricity, which also comes from third-party providers. If we
or third-party data centers which we utilize were to experience
a major power outage, we would have to rely on
back-up
generators. These
back-up
generators may not operate properly through a major power outage
and their fuel supply could also be inadequate during a major
power outage or disruptive event. Furthermore, we do not
currently have backup generators at our Foster City, California
headquarters. Information systems such as ours may be disrupted
by even brief power outages, or by the fluctuations in power
resulting from switches to and from
back-up
generators. This could give rise to obligations to certain of
our clients which could have an adverse effect on our results
for the period of time in which any disruption of utility
services to us occurs.
Interruption
or failure of our information technology and communications
systems could impair our ability to effectively deliver our
services, which could cause us to lose clients and harm our
operating results.
Our delivery of marketing and media services depends on the
continuing operation of our technology infrastructure and
systems. Any damage to or failure of our systems could result in
interruptions in our ability to deliver offerings quickly and
accurately
and/or
process visitors responses emanating from our various web
presences. Interruptions in our service could reduce our revenue
and profits, and our reputation could be damaged if people
believe our systems are unreliable. Our systems and operations
are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes,
terrorist attacks, floods, fires, power loss, break-ins,
hardware or software failures, telecommunications failures,
computer viruses or other attempts to harm our systems, and
similar events.
We lease or maintain server space in various locations,
including in San Francisco, California. Our California
facilities are located in areas with a high risk of major
earthquakes. Our facilities are also subject to break-ins,
sabotage and intentional acts of vandalism, and to potential
disruptions if the operators of these facilities have financial
difficulties. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and
our disaster recovery planning cannot account for all
eventualities. The occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision
to close a facility we are using without adequate notice for
financial reasons or other unanticipated problems at our
facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our service.
Any unscheduled interruption in our service would result in an
immediate loss of revenue. If we experience frequent or
persistent system failures, the attractiveness of our
technologies and services to clients and website publishers
could be permanently harmed. The steps we have taken to increase
the reliability and redundancy of our systems are expensive,
reduce our operating margin, and may not be successful in
reducing the frequency or duration of unscheduled interruptions.
Any
constraints on the capacity of our technology infrastructure
could delay the effectiveness of our operations or result in
system failures, which would result in the loss of clients and
harm our business and results of operations.
Our future success depends in part on the efficient performance
of our software and technology infrastructure. As the numbers of
websites and Internet users increase, our technology
infrastructure may not be able to meet the increased demand. A
sudden and unexpected increase in the volume of user responses
could strain the capacity of our technology infrastructure. Any
capacity constraints we experience could lead to slower response
times or system failures and adversely affect the availability
of websites and the level of user responses received, which
could result in the loss of clients or revenue or harm to our
business and results of operations.
We
could lose clients if we fail to detect click-through or other
fraud on advertisements in a manner that is acceptable to our
clients.
We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent clicks or actions on
our websites or our third-party publishers websites. We
may in the future have to refund revenue that our clients have
paid to us and that was later attributed to, or suspected to be
caused by, fraud. Click-through fraud occurs when an individual
clicks on an ad displayed on a website or an automated system is
used to create such clicks with the intent of generating the
revenue share payment to the publisher rather than to view the
underlying content. Action fraud occurs
22
when on-line forms are completed with false or fictitious
information in an effort to increase the compensable actions in
respect of which a web publisher is to be compensated. From time
to time we have experienced fraudulent clicks or actions and we
do not charge our clients for such fraudulent clicks or actions
when they are detected. It is conceivable that this activity
could negatively affect our profitability, and this type of
fraudulent act could hurt our reputation. If fraudulent clicks
or actions are not detected, the affected clients may experience
a reduced return on their investment in our marketing programs,
which could lead the clients to become dissatisfied with our
campaigns, and in turn, lead to loss of clients and the related
revenue. Additionally, we have from time to time had to
terminate relationships with web publishers who we believed to
have engaged in fraud and we may have to do so in future.
Termination of such relationships entails a loss of revenue
associated with the legitimate actions or clicks generated by
such web publishers.
We
will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating
as a public company, which may adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition.
As a public company, we will incur significant accounting, legal
and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
We will incur costs associated with our public company reporting
requirements. We also anticipate that we will incur costs
associated with corporate governance requirements, including
requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and
The NASDAQ Global Market. We expect these rules and regulations
to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. Our management
and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of
time to these compliance initiatives. Furthermore, these laws
and regulations could make it more difficult or more costly for
us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and
officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept
reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher
costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of
these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to
attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of
directors, our board committees or as executive officers. We
cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional
costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. We are
currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to
these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of
additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In
particular, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, we
must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our
internal control over financial reporting to allow management
and our independent registered public accounting firm to report
on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, or Section 404. Our compliance with Section 404
will require that we incur substantial expense and expend
significant management time on compliance-related issues.
If we
fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our
ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely
basis could be impaired, which would adversely affect our
ability to operate our business.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. We may in the future discover
areas of our internal financial and accounting controls and
procedures that need improvement. Our internal control over
financial reporting will not prevent or detect all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the control systems objectives will be met. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. If we
are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls,
we may not be able to produce accurate financial statements on a
timely basis, which could adversely affect our ability to
operate our business and could result in regulatory action.
23
Risks
Related to This Offering and Ownership of Our Common
Stock
Our
stock price may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell
shares of our common stock at or above the price you
paid.
Prior to this offering there has been no public market for
shares of our common stock, and an active public market for our
shares may not develop or be sustained after this offering. We
and the representatives of the underwriters will determine the
offering price of our common stock through negotiation. This
price will not necessarily reflect the price at which investors
in the market will be willing to buy and sell our shares
following this offering. In addition, the trading price of our
common stock following this offering could be highly volatile
and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various
factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors
include those discussed in this Risk Factors section
of this prospectus and others such as:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities
analysts;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of new services,
significant contracts, commercial relationships, acquisitions or
capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
developments with respect to intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a
timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our commencement of, or involvement in, litigation;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our
regulatory approvals; and
|
|
|
|
a slowdown in our industry or the general economy.
|
In recent years, the stock market in general, and the market for
technology and Internet-based companies in particular, has
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of those companies. Broad market and industry
factors may seriously affect the market price of our common
stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. These
fluctuations may be even more pronounced in the trading market
for our stock shortly following this offering. In addition, in
the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market
and the market price of a particular companys securities,
securities class action litigation has often been instituted
against these companies. Such litigation, if instituted against
us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
managements attention and resources.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or
misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and
trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by
the research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us or our business. We do not currently have and
may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry
analysts. If no securities or industry analysts commence
coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock would
be negatively impacted. In the event we obtain securities or
industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us
issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock, our stock price
would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease
coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us
regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets,
which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to
decline.
Our
directors, executive officers and principal stockholders and
their respective affiliates will continue to have substantial
control over us after this offering and could delay or prevent a
change in corporate control.
After this offering, our directors, executive officers and
holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their
affiliates, will beneficially own, in the aggregate,
approximately % of our outstanding
common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters
option to purchase additional shares of our common stock in this
offering. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will
continue to have substantial control over the outcome of matters
submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the
election of directors and
24
any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of
our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together,
will continue to have significant influence over the management
and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of
ownership may have the effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in corporate control;
|
|
|
|
impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business
combination involving us; or
|
|
|
|
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or
otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
|
Future
sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock
price to decline.
If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intent to
sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market after the
180-day
contractual
lock-up,
which period may be extended in certain limited circumstances,
and other legal restrictions on resale discussed in this
prospectus lapse, the trading price of our common stock could
decline significantly and could decline below the initial public
offering price. Based on shares outstanding as of
September 30, 2009, upon the completion of this offering,
we will have outstanding
approximately shares
of common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option and no exercise of outstanding options. Of
these shares, shares of common stock, plus any shares sold upon
exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option, will
be immediately freely tradable, without restriction, in the
public market. The underwriters may, in their sole discretion,
permit our officers, directors, employees and current
stockholders to sell shares prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements.
After the
lock-up
agreements pertaining to this offering expire and based on
shares outstanding as of September 30, 2009, an additional
34,631,876 shares will be eligible for sale in the public
market. In addition, (i) the 10,654,296 shares subject
to outstanding options under our equity incentive plans as of
September 30, 2009, and (ii) the shares reserved for
future issuance under our equity incentive plans will become
eligible for sale in the public market in the future, subject to
certain legal and contractual limitations. If these additional
shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold,
in the public market, the price of our common stock could
decline substantially.
Purchasers
of common stock in this offering will experience immediate and
substantial dilution in the book value of their
investment.
The initial offering price of our common stock is substantially
higher than the expected net tangible book value per share of
our common stock immediately after this offering. Therefore, if
you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur
an immediate dilution of $ in net
tangible book value per share from the price you paid. In
addition, following this offering, purchasers in the offering
will have contributed
approximately % of the total
consideration paid by stockholders to us to purchase shares of
our common stock. In addition, if the underwriters exercise
their option to purchase additional shares or if outstanding
options are exercised, you will experience further dilution. For
a further description of the dilution that you will experience
immediately after this offering, see the section of this
prospectus entitled Dilution.
We
have broad discretion to determine how to use the funds raised
in this offering, and may use them in ways that may not enhance
our operating results or the price of our common
stock.
Our management will have broad discretion over the use of
proceeds from this offering, and we could spend the proceeds
from this offering in ways our stockholders may not agree with
or that do not yield a favorable return. We are required to use
a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to repay the
outstanding balance of our term loan. We intend to use the
remaining net proceeds from this offering for working capital,
capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. We
may also use a portion of the net proceeds to make additional
repayments on our credit facility or acquire other businesses,
products or technologies. If we do not invest or apply the
proceeds of this offering in ways that improve our operating
results, we may fail to achieve expected financial results,
which could cause our stock price to decline.
25
Provisions
in our charter documents following this offering, under Delaware
law and in contractual obligations, could discourage a takeover
that stockholders may consider favorable and may lead to
entrenchment of management.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
that will be in effect as of the closing of this offering will
contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or
preventing changes in control or changes in our management
without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions
will include:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms,
which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the
membership of a majority of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits
the ability of minority stockholders to elect director
candidates;
|
|
|
|
the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a
director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board
of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director,
which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on
our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to determine to issue
shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other
terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights,
without stockholder approval, which could be used to
significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which
forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special
meeting of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be
called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief
executive officer or the board of directors, which may delay the
ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal
or to take action, including the removal of directors; and
|
|
|
|
advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in
order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to
propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders
meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the
acquirors own slate of directors or otherwise attempting
to obtain control of us.
|
We are in the process of reincorporating in Delaware and will be
subject to certain anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law
following this offering. Under Delaware law, a corporation may
not, in general, engage in a business combination with any
holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has
held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board
of directors has approved the transaction. For a description of
our capital stock, see Description of Capital Stock.
We do
not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and,
consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your
investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our
common stock.
We do not intend to declare and pay dividends on our capital
stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest
our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Additionally,
the terms of certain of our credit facilities restrict our
ability to pay dividends. Therefore, you are not likely to
receive any dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable
future.
26
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, particularly in the sections titled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, contains forward-looking statements that
involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements
other than statements of historical facts contained in this
prospectus, including statements regarding our future financial
condition, business strategy and plans and objectives of
management for future operations, are forward-looking
statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as believe,
may, might, objective,
estimate, continue,
anticipate, intend, should,
plan, expect, predict,
potential, or the negative of these terms or other
similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking
statements largely on our current expectations and projections
about future events and financial trends that we believe may
affect our financial condition, results of operations, business
strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements
are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions
described under the section titled Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this prospectus, regarding, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our immature industry and relatively new business model;
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our growth effectively;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on Internet search companies to attract Internet
visitors;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage any future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on a small number of large clients and our
dependence on a small number of client verticals for a majority
of our revenue;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key
personnel;
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast our operating results and
appropriately plan our expenses;
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete in our industry;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enhance and maintain our client and vendor
relationships;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop new services and enhancements and
features to meet new demands from our clients;
|
|
|
|
our ability to raise additional capital in the future, if needed;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in our domestic and potential future
international markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the use of proceeds from this
offering.
|
These risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this
prospectus may include additional factors that could adversely
impact our business and financial performance. These statements
reflect our current views with respect to future events and are
based on assumptions and subject to risk and uncertainties.
Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly-changing
environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is
not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor
can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the
extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause
actual results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statements.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events and circumstances
reflected in the forward-looking statements may not be achieved
or occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assume
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the
forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we
undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking
statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus to
conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our
expectations.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we
reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the
registration statement on
Form S-1,
of which this prospectus is a part, that we have filed with the
SEC with the understanding that our actual future results,
levels of activity, performance and achievements may be
materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our
forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
27
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of our
common stock in this offering will be approximately
$ million, or approximately
$ million if the underwriters
exercise their right to purchase additional shares of common
stock to cover over-allotments in full, based upon an assumed
initial public offering price of $
per share, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses. Each $1.00
increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price
of $ per share would increase
(decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by
approximately $ million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same. We may also
increase or decrease the number of shares we are offering. Each
increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 shares in the number of
shares offered by us would increase (decrease) the net proceeds
to us from this offering by approximately
$ million, assuming that the
assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and
after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We do
not expect that a change in the offering price or the number of
shares by these amounts would have a material effect on our uses
of the net proceeds from this offering, although it may impact
the amount of time prior to which we may need to seek additional
capital.
We currently intend to use our net proceeds from this offering
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $26.3 million of the net proceeds from this
offering to repay the outstanding balance of our term loan. The
interest rate under our term loan varies dependent upon the
ratio of funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and ranges from LIBOR
+ 2.25% to 3.0% or Prime + 0.75% to 1.25%. The term
loan expires in September 2013.
|
|
|
|
the remaining net proceeds from this offering for working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
purposes.
|
We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to make additional
repayments on our credit facility or acquire other businesses,
products or technologies.
The expected use of net proceeds of this offering represents our
current intentions based upon our present plans and business
conditions. The amounts we actually expend in these areas may
vary significantly from our current intentions and will depend
upon a number of factors, including future sales growth, success
of our engineering efforts, cash generated from future
operations, if any, and actual expenses to operate our business.
As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with
certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be
received upon the closing of this offering. Accordingly, our
management will have broad discretion in the application of the
net proceeds, and investors will be relying on the judgment of
our management regarding the application of the net proceeds of
this offering.
The amount and timing of our expenditures will depend on several
factors, including the amount and timing of our spending on
sales and marketing activities and research and development
activities, as well as our use of cash for other corporate
activities. Pending the uses described above, we intend to
invest the net proceeds in a variety of capital preservation
instruments, including short-term, interest-bearing, investment
grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or
guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any
future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth
and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash
dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any
future determination related to dividend policy will be made at
the discretion of our board of directors. The loan agreement for
our credit facility contains a prohibition on the payout of cash
dividends.
28
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents,
current debt and capitalization as of September 30, 2009
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the conversion of
all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into
21,176,533 shares of common stock effective immediately
prior to the closing of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect, in addition, the
application of the estimated net proceeds, as set forth in
Use of Proceeds, of
$ million from our sale
of shares
of common stock that we are offering at an assumed public
offering price of $ per share,
which is the midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of
this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us.
|
You should read the information in this table together with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
28,095
|
|
|
$
|
28,095
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, current
|
|
$
|
13,182
|
|
|
$
|
10,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, noncurrent
|
|
$
|
52,995
|
|
|
$
|
28,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred shares, no par value,
30,000,000 shares authorized, 15,808,777 shares issued
and outstanding, actual; 30,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued and outstanding, pro forma; no shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, no shares authorized,
issued and outstanding, actual; 5,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma;
5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding,
pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized,
13,455,343 shares issued and outstanding, actual;
55,000,000 shares authorized, 34,631,876 shares issued
and outstanding, pro forma; 100,000,000 shares
authorized, shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
15,627
|
|
|
|
59,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
66,093
|
|
|
|
66,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
81,723
|
|
|
|
125,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
178,121
|
|
|
$
|
153,371
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering
price of $ per share, the midpoint
of the range reflected on the cover page of this prospectus,
would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents,
additional paid-in capital, total stockholders equity and
total capitalization by approximately |
29
|
|
|
|
|
$ , assuming that the number of
shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us. We may also increase or decrease the
number of shares we are offering. Each increase (decrease) of
1,000,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us
would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents,
additional paid-in capital, total shareholders equity and
total capitalization by approximately
$ , assuming that the assumed
initial public offering price remains the same, and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The as adjusted
information discussed above is illustrative only and will adjust
based on the actual initial public offering price and other
terms of this offering determined at pricing. |
The outstanding share information in the table above is based on
34,631,876 shares of common stock outstanding as of
September 30, 2009, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 10,654,296 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of
September 30, 2009 pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan and having a weighted-average exercise price of $8.1717 per
share;
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,726,814 additional shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan as of September 30, 2009; provided, however, that
immediately upon the signing of the underwriting agreement for
this offering, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will terminate so
that no further awards may be granted under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan, and the shares then remaining and reserved for
future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan shall
become available for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan; and
|
|
|
|
the shares reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and up to 300,000 additional shares of common
stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan, as well as any automatic
increases in the number of shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance under each of these benefit plans, which will
become effective immediately upon the signing of the
underwriting agreement for this offering.
|
30
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your
interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between
the initial public offering price per share of our common stock
and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share
of our common stock after this offering. As of
September 30, 2009, our pro forma net tangible book value
was $ , or
$ per share of common stock. Our
pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the
amount of our total tangible assets reduced by the amount of our
total liabilities and divided by the total number of shares of
our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2009,
after giving effect to the automatic conversion of all
outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into shares of
common stock immediately prior to the closing of this offering.
After giving effect to our sale in this offering
of shares
of common stock at the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of the
range reflected on the cover page of this prospectus, and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2009
would have been approximately $ ,
or $ per share. This represents an
immediate increase of net tangible book value of
$ per share to our existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per share to investors
purchasing common stock in this offering. The following table
illustrates this per share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of
September 30, 2009, before giving effect to this offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share attributed to new investors purchasing shares in this
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect
to this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share
would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net tangible
book value by $ , or
$ per share, and the pro forma as
adjusted dilution per share to investors in this offering by
$ per share, assuming that the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. We may also increase or
decrease the number of shares we are offering. An increase of
1,000,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us
would increase our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value
by approximately $ , or
$ per share, and the pro forma as
adjusted dilution per share to investors in this offering would
be $ per share, assuming that the
assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and
after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
Similarly, a decrease of 1,000,000 shares in the number of
shares offered by us would decrease our pro forma as adjusted
net tangible book value by approximately
$ , or
$ per share, and the pro forma as
adjusted dilution per share to investors in this offering would
be $ per share, assuming that the
assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and
after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The
pro forma as adjusted information discussed above is
illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual initial
public offering price and other terms of this offering
determined at pricing.
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
shares of our common stock in full in this offering, the pro
forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after the
offering would be $ per share, the
increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share to existing stockholders would be
$ per share and the dilution to
new investors purchasing shares in this offering would be
$ per share.
The following table summarizes on a pro forma as adjusted basis
as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us by
our existing stockholders and by new investors purchasing shares
in this offering;
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
the total consideration paid to us by our existing stockholders
and by new investors purchasing shares in this offering,
assuming an initial public offering price of
$ per share (before deducting the
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us in connection with this
offering); and
|
|
|
|
the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by
new investors purchasing shares in this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
34,631,876
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,030,000
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
shares of our common stock in full in this offering, our
existing stockholders would own %
and our new investors would own %
of the total number of common stock outstanding upon completion
of this offering. The total consideration paid by our existing
stockholders would be $ ,
or %, and the total consideration
paid by our new investors would be
$ ,
or %.
The above discussion and tables are based on
34,631,876 shares of common stock outstanding as of
September 30, 2009, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 10,654,296 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of
September 30, 2009 pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan and having a weighted-average exercise price of $8.1717 per
share;
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,726,814 additional shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan as of September 30, 2009; provided, however, that
immediately upon the signing of the underwriting agreement for
this offering, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will terminate so
that no further awards may be granted under our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan, and the shares then remaining and reserved for
future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan shall
become available for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan; and
|
|
|
|
the shares reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and up to 300,000 additional shares of common
stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan, as well as any automatic
increases in the number of shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance under each of these benefit plans, which will
become effective immediately upon the signing of the
underwriting agreement for this offering.
|
If all outstanding options were exercised, then our existing
stockholders, including the holders of these options, would
own % and our new investors would
own % of the total number of our
common stock outstanding upon the closing of this offering. The
total consideration paid by our existing stockholders would be
$ ,
or %, and the total consideration
paid by our new investors would be
$ ,
or %. The average price per share
paid by our existing stockholders would be
$ and the average price per share
paid by our new investors would be
$ .
32
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be
read together with our consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected
consolidated financial data in this section is not intended to
replace our consolidated financial statements and the related
notes. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of
our future results and our interim results are not necessarily
indicative of the results that should be expected for the full
fiscal year.
We derived the consolidated statements of operations data for
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
consolidated balance sheets data as of June 30, 2008 and
2009 from our audited consolidated financial statements
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated
statements of operations data for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2005 and 2006 and the consolidated balance sheets
data as of June 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not
included in this prospectus. The consolidated statements of
operations data for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2009 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2009 are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
109,556
|
|
|
$
|
142,408
|
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
63,678
|
|
|
$
|
78,552
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
65,653
|
|
|
|
85,820
|
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
45,281
|
|
|
|
55,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
43,903
|
|
|
|
56,588
|
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
23,505
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
17,265
|
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
|
|
7,166
|
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
6,835
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
23,220
|
|
|
|
31,266
|
|
|
|
34,021
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
11,752
|
|
|
|
11,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
20,683
|
|
|
|
25,322
|
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
21,196
|
|
|
|
25,362
|
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(8,136
|
)
|
|
|
(9,773
|
)
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
(4,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
13,060
|
|
|
|
15,589
|
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
|
|
3,304
|
|
|
|
6,513
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,060
|
|
|
$
|
13,769
|
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: 8% non-cumulative dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(3,218
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(6,240
|
)
|
|
|
(6,591
|
)
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(5,925
|
)
|
|
|
(8,599
|
)
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders basic
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
$
|
3,902
|
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
$
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders basic
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
$
|
3,902
|
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
$
|
2,207
|
|
Undistributed earnings re-allocated to common stock
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders diluted
|
|
$
|
4,038
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,035
|
|
|
$
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per
share
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
12,411
|
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,279
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per
share
|
|
|
14,543
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
15,131
|
|
|
|
15,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma basic net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,582
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma diluted net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,558
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements
included in this prospectus for an explanation of the method
used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per share and pro
forma basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock. |
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
19,418
|
|
|
$
|
30,593
|
|
|
$
|
26,765
|
|
|
$
|
24,953
|
|
|
$
|
25,182
|
|
|
$
|
28,095
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
39,859
|
|
|
|
36,294
|
|
|
|
42,769
|
|
|
|
17,022
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
19,942
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
71,350
|
|
|
|
101,203
|
|
|
|
118,536
|
|
|
|
179,746
|
|
|
|
212,878
|
|
|
|
235,410
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
26,657
|
|
|
|
39,567
|
|
|
|
37,831
|
|
|
|
86,032
|
|
|
|
96,289
|
|
|
|
110,284
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
|
10,250
|
|
|
|
51,654
|
|
|
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
66,177
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
18,350
|
|
|
|
37,312
|
|
|
|
50,311
|
|
|
|
73,186
|
|
|
|
81,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
23,200
|
|
|
$
|
21,659
|
|
|
$
|
25,197
|
|
|
$
|
24,751
|
|
|
$
|
32,570
|
|
|
$
|
(261
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,808
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
5,671
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
24,290
|
|
|
$
|
32,619
|
|
|
$
|
36,112
|
|
|
$
|
36,279
|
|
|
$
|
56,872
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less interest income
plus interest expense, provision for taxes, depreciation
expense, amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense
and foreign-exchange (loss) gain. Please see Summary
Consolidated Financial Data Adjusted EBITDA
for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to our net income calculated in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. |
35
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed
below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in the
sections titled Risk Factors and Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
QuinStreet is a leader in vertical marketing and media on the
Internet. We have built a strong set of capabilities to engage
Internet visitors with targeted media and to connect our
marketing clients with their potential customers online. We
focus on serving clients in large, information-intensive
industry verticals where relevant, targeted media and offerings
help visitors make informed choices, find the products that
match their needs, and thus become qualified customer prospects
for our clients.
We deliver cost-effective marketing results to our clients,
predictably and scalably, most typically in the form of a
qualified lead or click. These leads or clicks can then convert
into a customer or sale for the client at a rate that results in
an acceptable marketing cost to them. We get paid by clients
primarily when we deliver qualified leads or clicks as defined
by our agreements with them. Because we bear the costs of media,
our programs must deliver a value to our clients and a media
yield, or our ability to generate an acceptable margin on our
media costs, that provides a sound financial outcome for us. Our
general process is:
|
|
|
|
|
We own or access targeted media;
|
|
|
|
We run advertisements or other forms of marketing messages and
programs in that media to create visitor responses or clicks
through to client offerings;
|
|
|
|
We match these responses or clicks to client offerings or brands
that meet visitor interests or needs, converting visitors into
qualified leads or clicks; and
|
|
|
|
We optimize client matches and media yield such that we achieve
desired results for clients and a sound financial outcome for us.
|
Our primary financial objective has been and remains creating
revenue growth, from sustainable sources, at target levels of
profitability. Our primary financial objective is not to
maximize profits, but rather to achieve target levels of
profitability while investing in various growth initiatives, as
we believe we are in the early stages of a large, long-term
market. We have been successful in increasing revenue each year
since our inception. We became profitable in 2002 and have
remained so since that time.
Our Direct Marketing Services, or DMS, business accounted for
95%, 98%, 99% and 99% of our net revenue in fiscal years 2007,
2008 and 2009 and the first three months of fiscal year 2010,
respectively. Our DMS business derives substantially all of its
net revenue from fees earned through the delivery of qualified
leads and clicks to our clients. Through a deep vertical focus,
targeted media presence and our technology platform, we are able
to reliably deliver targeted, measurable marketing results to
our clients.
Our two largest client verticals are education and financial
services. Our education vertical has historically been our
largest vertical, representing 78%, 74%, 58% and 51% of net
revenue in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first three
months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. DeVry Inc., a
for-profit education company and our largest client, accounted
for 22%, 23%, 19%, and 13% of total net revenue for fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first three months of fiscal year
2010, respectively. Our financial services vertical, which we
have grown both organically and through acquisitions,
represented 7%, 11%, 31% and 39% of net revenue in fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first three months of fiscal year
2010, respectively. Other DMS verticals, consisting primarily of
home services,
business-to-business,
or B2B, and
36
healthcare, represented 10%, 13%, 10% and 9% of net revenue in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first three months of
fiscal year 2010, respectively.
In addition, we derived 5%, 2%, 1% and 1% of our net revenue in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first three months of
fiscal year 2010, respectively, from the provision of a hosted
solution and related services for clients in the direct selling
industry, also referred to as our Direct Selling Services, or
DSS, business.
We have generated substantially all of our revenue from sales to
clients in the United States.
We are subject to economic or business factors that affect our
client verticals. For instance, presently, clients in particular
verticals such as financial services, particularly mortgage,
credit cards and deposits, small- to medium-sized business
customers and home services are facing very difficult conditions
and their marketing spending has been negatively affected. In
general, we address challenges created by these adverse economic
or business conditions by shifting investment and resources to
other client verticals that might be less challenged or by
focusing on opportunities with specific clients and subsets of
client verticals that might be less affected by those
challenges. However, we also invest in client verticals that may
face near-term challenges but present long-term growth potential.
We face an additional challenge with regard to DeVry, our
largest client, which accounted for approximately 19% and 13% of
our net revenue for fiscal year 2009 and the first three months
of fiscal year 2010, respectively. DeVry has recently retained
an advertising agency and has reduced its purchases of leads
from us. We have been addressing this challenge by working with
DeVry and the agency to understand their evolving needs and
strategies and how we can best serve them going forward. In
addition, we have been expanding our business with other clients
in our education client vertical. We are also expanding our
client base in education to replace visitor matches previously
delivered to DeVry.
Trends
Affecting our Business
Seasonality
Our results from our education client vertical are subject to
significant fluctuation as a result of seasonality. In
particular, our quarters ending December 31 (our second fiscal
quarter) typically demonstrate seasonal weakness. In those
quarters, there is lower availability of lead supply from some
forms of media during the holiday period and our education
clients often request fewer leads due to holiday staffing. In
our quarters ending March 31, this trend generally reverses
with better lead availability and often new budgets at the
beginning of the year for our clients with financial years
ending December 31. For example, in the quarters ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008 net revenue from our
education clients declined 6% and 13%, respectively, from the
previous quarter.
Acquisitions
Beginning in fiscal year 2008, we executed on our strategy to
increase the depth within our existing verticals and diversify
our business among these verticals by substantially increasing
our spending on acquisitions of businesses and technologies. For
example, in February 2008, we acquired ReliableRemodeler.com,
Inc., or ReliableRemodeler, an Oregon-based company specializing
in online home renovation and contractor referrals for
$17.5 million in cash and $8.0 million in
non-interest-bearing, unsecured promissory notes, in an effort
to increase our presence within our home services vertical. In
April 2008, we acquired Cyberspace Communication Corporation, an
Oklahoma-based online marketing company doing business as
SureHits, for $27.5 million in cash and $18.0 million
in potential earn-out payments, in an effort to increase our
presence within the financial services vertical. During fiscal
years 2008 and 2009, in addition to the acquisitions mentioned
above, we acquired an aggregate of 21 and 34 online publishing
businesses, respectively.
In October 2009, we acquired the website business Insure.com
from Life Quote, Inc. for $15.0 million in cash and a
$1.0 million non-interest bearing, unsecured promissory
note. In November 2009, we acquired the website assets of the
Internet.com division of WebMediaBrands, Inc. for $16.0 million
in cash and a $2.0 million non-interest-bearing, unsecured
promissory note.
37
Our acquisition strategy may result in significant fluctuations
in our available working capital from period to period and over
the years. We may use cash, stock or promissory notes to acquire
various businesses or technologies, and we cannot accurately
predict the timing of those acquisitions or the impact on our
cash flows and balance sheet. Large acquisitions or multiple
acquisitions within a particular period may significantly impact
our financial results for that period. We may utilize debt
financing to make acquisitions, which could give rise to higher
interest expense and more restrictive operating covenants. We
may also utilize our stock as consideration, which could result
in substantial dilution.
Client
Verticals
To date, we have generated the majority of our revenue from
clients in our educational vertical. We expect that a majority
of our revenue in fiscal year 2010 will be generated from
clients in our education and financial services client
verticals. A downturn in economic or market conditions adversely
affecting the education industry or the financial services
industry would negatively impact our business and financial
condition. Over the past year, education marketing spending has
remained relatively stable, but we cannot assure you that this
stability will continue. Marketing budgets for clients in our
education vertical are impacted by a number of factors,
including the availability of student financial aid, the
regulation of for-profit financial institutions and economic
conditions. Over the past year, some segments of the financial
services industry, particularly mortgages, credit cards and
deposits, have seen declines in marketing budgets given the
difficult market conditions. These declines may continue or
worsen. In addition, the education and financial services
industries are highly regulated. Changes in regulations or
government actions may negatively impact our clients
marketing practices and budgets and, therefore, adversely affect
our financial results.
Development
and Acquisition of Vertical Media
One of the primary challenges of our business is finding or
creating media that is targeted enough to attract prospects
economically for our clients and at costs that work for our
business model. In order to continue to grow our business, we
must be able to continue to find or develop quality vertical
media on a cost-effective basis. Our inability to find or
develop vertical media could impair our growth or adversely
affect our financial performance.
Basis of
Presentation
General
We operate in two segments: DMS and DSS. For further discussion
or financial information about our reporting segments, see
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in
this prospectus.
Net
Revenue
DMS. We derive substantially all of our
revenue from fees earned through the delivery of qualified leads
or paid clicks. We deliver targeted and measurable results
through a vertical focus that we classify into the following key
client verticals: education, financial services, home services,
B2B and healthcare.
DSS. We derived approximately 5%, 2%, 1% and
1% of our net revenue in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the first three months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. We
expect DSS to continue to represent an immaterial portion of our
business.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of media costs, personnel
costs, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets,
depreciation expense and amortization of internal software
development costs on revenue-producing technologies. Media costs
consist primarily of fees paid to website publishers that are
directly related to a revenue-generating event and PPC ad
purchases from Internet search companies. We pay these Internet
search companies and website publishers on a revenue-share,
cost-per-lead,
or CPL,
cost-per-click,
or CPC, and
cost-per-thousand-impressions,
or CPM, basis. Personnel costs include salaries, bonuses,
stock-based compensation expense and employee benefit costs.
Compensation expense is primarily related to individuals
associated with maintaining our servers and websites, our
editorial staff, client management, creative team, compliance
group and media purchasing analysts. We capitalize costs
associated with software developed or obtained for internal use.
38
Costs incurred in the development phase are capitalized and
amortized in cost of revenue over the products estimated
useful life. We anticipate that our cost of revenue will
increase in absolute dollars.
Operating
Expenses
We classify our operating expenses into three categories:
product development, sales and marketing and general and
administrative. Our operating expenses consist primarily of
personnel costs and, to a lesser extent, professional fees, rent
and allocated costs. Personnel costs for each category of
operating expenses generally include salaries, bonuses and
commissions, stock-based compensation expense and employee
benefit costs.
Product Development. Product development
expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and professional
services fees associated with the development and maintenance of
our technology platforms, development and launching of our
websites, product-based quality assurance and testing. We
believe that continued investment in technology is critical to
attaining our strategic objectives and, as a result, we expect
technology development and enhancement expenses to increase in
absolute dollars in future periods.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of personnel costs (including
commissions) and, to a lesser extent, allocated overhead,
professional services, advertising, travel and marketing
materials. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in
absolute dollars as we hire additional personnel in sales and
marketing to support our increasing revenue base and product
offerings.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs of
our executive, finance, legal, employee benefits and compliance
and other administrative personnel, as well as accounting and
legal professional services fees and other corporate expenses.
We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in
absolute dollars in future periods as we continue to invest in
corporate infrastructure and incur additional expenses
associated with being a public company, including increased
legal and accounting costs, investor relations costs, higher
insurance premiums and compliance costs associated with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income (expense), net, consists primarily of
interest income and interest expense. Interest expense is
related to our credit facilities and the promissory notes issued
in connection with our acquisitions. The outstanding balance of
our credit facilities and acquisition-related promissory notes
was $40.5 million and $26.3 million, respectively, as
of September 30, 2009. We expect interest expense to
decline in the near future as we intend to repay the outstanding
balance of our term loan from the net proceeds of this offering;
however, borrowings could subsequently increase as we continue
to implement our acquisition strategy. Interest income
represents interest received on our cash and cash equivalents,
which we expect will increase in the near term with the
investment of the net proceeds of this offering.
Income
Tax Expense
We are subject to tax in the United States as well as other tax
jurisdictions or countries in which we conduct business.
Earnings from our limited
non-U.S. activities
are subject to local country income tax and may be subject to
current U.S. income tax.
As of September 30, 2009, we did not have net operating
loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes and had
approximately $2.8 million in California net operating loss
carryforwards that begin to expire in March 2011, and that we
expect to utilize in an amended return. The California net
operating loss carryforwards will not offset future taxable
income, but may instead result in a refund of historical taxes
paid. As of September 30, 2009, our Japanese subsidiary had
net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $370,000 that
will begin to expire in 2011. These net operating loss
carryforwards were fully reserved as of September 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, we had net deferred tax assets of
$5.5 million. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily
of accruals, reserves and stock-based compensation expense not
currently deductible for tax purposes. We assess the need for a
valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets by evaluating
both positive
39
and negative evidence that may exist. Any adjustment to the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be recorded in the
income statement of the periods that the adjustment is
determined to be required.
On July 1, 2007, we adopted the authoritative accounting
guidance prescribing a threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
guidance also provides for de-recognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The
guidance utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain
tax positions. Step one, Recognition, requires a company to
determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that a
tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit,
including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes,
if any. If a tax position is not considered more likely
than not to be sustained then no benefits of the position
are to be recognized. Step two, Measurement, is based on the
largest amount of benefit, which is more likely than not to be
realized on ultimate settlement.
Effective July 1, 2007, we adopted the accounting guidance
on uncertainties in income tax. The cumulative effect of
adoption to the opening balance of the retained earnings account
was $1,705.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
In presenting our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepting accounting
principals, or GAAP, we are required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures.
Some of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make
relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain
to future events. We base these estimates and assumptions on
historical experience or on various other factors that we
believe to be reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. On an ongoing basis, we reconsider and evaluate
our estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ
significantly from these estimates.
We believe that the critical accounting policies listed below
involve our more significant judgments, assumptions and
estimates and, therefore, could have the greatest potential
impact on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we
believe that a discussion of these policies is necessary to
understand and evaluate the consolidated financial statements
contained in this prospectus.
For further information on our critical and other significant
accounting policies, see Note 2 of our consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive revenue from two segments: DMS and DSS. DMS revenue,
which constituted 95%, 98% and 99% of our net revenue for fiscal
years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, is derived primarily
from fees that are earned through the delivery of qualified
leads or paid clicks. We recognize revenue when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably
assured. Delivery is deemed to have occurred at the time a lead
or click is delivered to the client, provided that no
significant obligations remain.
From time to time, we may agree to credit clients for certain
leads or clicks if they fail to meet the contractual or other
guidelines of a particular client. We have established a sales
reserve based on historical experience. To date, our reserve has
been adequate for these credits. The adequacy of this reserve
depends on our ability to estimate the number of credits that we
will grant to our clients. If we were to change any of the
assumptions or judgments made in calculating the amount of the
reserve, it could cause a material change in the net revenue
that we report in a particular period. Our assessment of the
likelihood of collection is also a critical element in
determining the timing of revenue recognition. If we do not
believe that collection is reasonably assured, revenue will be
recognized on the earlier of the date that the collection is
reasonably assured or collection is made.
40
For a portion of our revenue, we have agreements with publishers
of online media used in the generation of leads or clicks. We
receive a fee from our clients and pay a fee to our publishers
either on a revenue-share, CPL, CPC or CPM basis. We are the
primary obligor in the transaction. As a result, the fees paid
by our clients are recognized as revenue and the fees paid to
our publishers are included in cost of revenue.
DSS revenue consists of
(i) set-up
and professional services fees and (ii) usage and hosting
fees. Set-up
and professional service fees that do not provide stand-alone
value to our clients are recognized over the contractual term of
the agreement or the expected client relationship period,
whichever is longer, effective when the application reaches the
go-live date. We define the go-live date
as the date when the application enters into a production
environment or all essential functionalities have been
delivered. We recognize usage and hosting fees on a monthly
basis as earned. Deferred revenue consists of billings or
payments in advance of reaching all the above revenue
recognition criteria, primarily comprising deferred DSS revenue.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Through June 30, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based
employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the
intrinsic value provisions of Accounting Principles Board, or
APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, or APB 25, and related interpretations and complied
with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Under
the intrinsic value method, compensation expense is measured on
the date of the grants as the difference between the fair value
of our common stock and the exercise or purchase price
multiplied by the number of stock options granted.
Effective July 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R), which
requires non-public companies that used the minimum value method
under SFAS 123 for either recognition or pro forma
disclosures to apply SFAS 123(R) using the
prospective-transition method. As such, we continue to apply the
intrinsic value method to equity awards outstanding at the date
of adoption of SFAS 123(R) that were measured using the
minimum value method. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), we
recognize the compensation cost of employee stock-based awards
granted subsequent to June 30, 2006 in the statement of
operations using the straight-line method over the vesting
period of the award.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based
compensation expense included in the related financial statement
line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
$
|
3,222
|
|
|
$
|
6,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,398
|
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimated the fair value of each option granted using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing method using the following
assumptions for the periods presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted average stock price volatility
|
|
48%
|
|
52%
|
|
62%
|
|
61%
|
|
73%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
4.6 - 6.1
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.6% - 4.9%
|
|
2.8% - 4.5%
|
|
1.8% - 3.1%
|
|
3.1%
|
|
2.5%
|
41
As of each stock option grant date, we considered the fair value
of the underlying common stock, determined as described below,
in order to establish the options exercise price.
As there has been no public market for our common stock prior to
this offering, and therefore a lack of company-specific
historical and implied volatility data, we have determined the
share price volatility for options granted based on an analysis
of reported data for a peer group of companies that granted
options with substantially similar terms. The expected
volatility of options granted has been determined using an
average of the historical volatility measures of this peer group
of companies for a period equal to the expected life of the
option. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process
using the same or similar entities until a sufficient amount of
historical information regarding the volatility of our own share
price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such
that the identified entities are no longer similar to us. In
this latter case, more suitable entities whose share prices are
publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.
The expected life of options granted has been determined
utilizing the simplified method as prescribed by the
SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 107,
Share-Based Payment, or SAB 107. The risk-free
interest rate is based on a daily treasury yield curve rate
whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock
options. We have not paid and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends on our shares of common stock; therefore, the expected
dividend yield is assumed to be zero.
In addition, SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated
at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates,
whereas SFAS 123 permitted companies to record forfeitures
based on actual forfeitures. We apply an estimated forfeiture
rate based on our historical forfeiture experience.
Since the beginning of fiscal year 2007, we granted stock
options with exercise prices as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
for Financial
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Reporting Purposes at
|
|
SFAS 123R
|
Grant Dates
|
|
Granted
|
|
per Share
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
July 20, 2006
|
|
|
88,100
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
$
|
428,034
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
133,794
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
678,175
|
|
December 1, 2006
|
|
|
713,000
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
3,590,525
|
|
January 31, 2007(1)
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
831,617
|
|
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
81,550
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
391,412
|
|
March 23, 2007
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
176,908
|
|
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,161,400
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
5,226,881
|
|
September 27, 2007
|
|
|
116,700
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
560,720
|
|
January 30, 2008
|
|
|
729,200
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
3,330,840
|
|
April 25, 2008
|
|
|
469,500
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
2,365,294
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
1,695,600
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
9,098,250
|
|
July 25, 2008(1)
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
11.31
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
434,775
|
|
October 2, 2008
|
|
|
277,900
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
1,385,081
|
|
January 28, 2009
|
|
|
331,800
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
1,686,738
|
|
April 29, 2009
|
|
|
184,800
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
957,467
|
|
August 7, 2009
|
|
|
1,875,050
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
13.93
|
|
|
|
17,716,410
|
|
August 7, 2009(1)
|
|
|
87,705
|
|
|
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
13.93
|
|
|
|
805,939
|
|
October 6, 2009
|
|
|
210,600
|
|
|
|
11.08
|
|
|
|
16.88
|
|
|
|
2,624,500
|
|
November 17, 2009
|
|
|
1,080,500
|
|
|
|
19.00
|
|
|
|
19.00
|
|
|
|
13,229,750
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options granted with an exercise price per share equal to 110%
of the fair market value of one share of our common stock, as
determined by our board of directors on the date of grant. |
42
We have historically granted stock options at exercise prices
equal to or greater than the fair market value as determined by
our board of directors on the date of grant, with input from
management. Because our common stock is not publicly traded, our
board of directors exercises significant judgment in determining
the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant based on
a number of objective and subjective factors. Factors considered
by our board of directors included:
|
|
|
|
|
company performance, our growth rate and financial condition at
the approximate time of the option grant;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the value of companies that we consider peers based on a number
of factors including, but not limited to, similarity to us with
respect to industry, business model, stage of growth, financial
risk or other factors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the company and our prospects since the last time the
board approved option grants and made a determination of fair
value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
amounts recently paid by investors for our common stock and
convertible preferred stock in
arms-length
transactions with stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the rights, preferences and privileges of preferred stock
relative to those of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
future financial projections; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
valuations completed in conjunction with, and at the time of,
each option grant.
|
We prepared contemporaneous valuations at each of the grant
dates consistent with the method outlined in the AICPA Practice
Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities
Issued as Compensation, for all option grant dates in fiscal
year 2008, 2009 and three months ended September 30, 2009.
The methodology we used derived equity values utilizing a
probability-weighted expected return method, or PWERM, that
weighs various potential liquidity outcomes with each outcome
assigned a probability to arrive at the weighted equity value.
For each of the possible events, a range of future equity values
is estimated, based on the market, income or cost approaches and
over a range of possible event dates, all plus or minus a
standard deviation for value and timing. The timing of these
events is based on discussion with our management. For each
future equity value scenario, the rights and preferences of each
stockholder class are considered in order to determine the
appropriate allocation of value to common shares. The value of
each common share is then multiplied by a discount factor
derived from the calculated discount rate and the expected
timing of the event (plus or minus a standard deviation of
time). The value per common share is then multiplied by an
estimated probability for each of the possible events based on
discussion with our management. The calculated value per common
share under each scenario is then discounted for a lack of
marketability. A probability-weighted value per share of common
stock is then determined. Under the PWERM, the value of our
common stock is estimated based upon an analysis of values for
our common stock assuming the following various possible future
events for the company:
|
|
|
|
|
initial public offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
strategic merger or sale;
|
|
|
|
|
|
dissolution/no value to common stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining a private company.
|
When using the PWERM, a market-comparable approach, an income
approach and a cost approach were used to estimate our aggregate
enterprise value at each valuation date. The market-comparable
approach estimates the fair market value of a company by
applying market multiples of publicly-traded firms in the same
or similar lines of business to the results and projected
results of the company being valued. When choosing the
market-comparable companies to be used for the market-comparable
approach, we focused on companies operating within the online
marketing and lead generation space. The comparable companies
remained largely unchanged during the valuation process. The
income approach involves applying an appropriate risk-adjusted
discount rate to projected debt free cash flows, based on
forecasted revenue and
43
costs. The cost approach involves identifying a companys
significant tangible assets, estimating the individual current
market values of each and then totaling them to derive the value
of the business as a whole. We used the cost approach method
under an assumption of dissolution.
We also prepared financial forecasts for each valuation report
date used in the computation of the enterprise value for both
the market-comparable approach and the income approach. The
financial forecasts were based on assumed revenue growth rates
that took into account our past experience and contemporaneous
future expectations. The risks associated with achieving these
forecasts were assessed in selecting the appropriate cost of
capital, which ranged from 15% to 16%.
We have performed these valuations since December 2003.
As an additional indicator of fair value, we note in the
individual valuation discussions below pricing of all sales of
our common stock for transactions occurring during the quarter
of the respective grant dates. Over the past several years, a
number of investors have purchased, or attempted to purchase,
shares from employees, former employees and other shareholders.
In some instances, we have exercised our right of first refusal
with regard to such proposed purchases and, accordingly,
purchased the shares for the price proposed by the investors,
and in other instances, we have chosen not to exercise our right
of first refusal and have permitted the proposed buyers to
complete the transactions with the sellers on the terms
disclosed to us.
While these transactions were not consummated in a highly liquid
market, we do believe that the transactions provide an
additional indicator of fair value based on the volume and
number of buyers. These transaction prices have indicated, as
additional support to our valuation analyses, that we have not
historically determined fair market values below the indications
of value for transactions in our common stock.
Discussion
of specific valuation inputs from July 2008 through November
2009
July 25, 2008. On July 25, 2008, our
board of directors determined a fair value of our common stock
of $10.28 per share, based on the factors described above as
well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated July 17,
2008. The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount of 16%, a
non-marketability discount of 23.4% and an estimated time to an
initial public offering or a strategic merger or sale of greater
than 12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50%
toward an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic
merger or sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2%
towards a liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair
value of $9.42 per share for our common stock. We determined to
set the fair value per share of our common stock at $10.28 per
share as of July 25, 2008, above the $9.42 per share
valuation as of July 17, 2008, since these valuations by
their nature involve estimates and judgments and, in our
opinion, the relatively small difference did not justify
reducing the fair market value determination for our common
stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
exercised our right of first refusal to repurchase
115,275 shares of common stock at an average price of
$8.47, with a low price of $8.00 and a high price of $8.60.
During this same period, we chose not to exercise our right of
first refusal for transactions totaling 30,000 shares of
common stock at an average price of $8.75, with a low price of
$8.50 and a high price of $9.00.
October 2, 2008. On October 2, 2008,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $10.28 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
September 24, 2008. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 16%, a non-marketability discount of 26.8%, an
estimated time to an initial public offering of greater than
12 months and an estimated time to a strategic merger or
sale of less than 12 months. The expected outcomes were
weighted 50% toward an initial public offering, 30% towards a
strategic merger or sale, 18% towards remaining a private
company and 2% towards a liquidation scenario. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $9.94 per share for our common stock.
We determined to set the fair value per share of our common
stock at $10.28 per share as of October 2, 2008, above the
$9.94 per share valuation as of September 24, 2008, since
these valuations by their nature involve estimates and judgments
and, in our opinion, the relatively small difference did not
justify reducing the fair market value determination for our
common stock. During the three months ended December 31,
2009, we exercised our right of first refusal to repurchase
8,000 shares of common stock at a price of $8.50. During
this
44
same period, we chose not to exercise our right of first
refusal for transactions totaling 57,000 shares of common
stock at a price of $8.50.
January 28, 2009. On January 28,
2008, our board of directors determined a fair value of our
common stock of $9.01 per share, based on the factors described
above as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
December 31, 2008. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 25%, an
estimated time to an initial public offering of 12 months
and an estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50% toward
an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic merger or
sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2% towards a
liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair value of
$9.01 per share for our common stock. During the three months
ended March 30, 2009, we exercised our right of first
refusal to repurchase 40,000 shares of common stock at an
average price of $7.31, with a low price of $6.25 and a high
price of $8.00. During this same period, there were no
transactions in our stock in which we chose not to exercise our
right of first refusal.
April 29, 2009. On April 29, 2009,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $9.01 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
March 31, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount
of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 20%, an estimated time
to an initial public offering of more than 12 months and an
estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50% toward
an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic merger or
sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2% towards a
liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair value of
$8.29 per share for our common stock. We determined to set the
fair value per share of our common stock at $9.01 per share as
of April 29, 2009, above the $8.29 per share valuation as
of March 31, 2009, since these valuations by their nature
involve estimates and judgments and, in our opinion, the
relatively small difference did not justify reducing the fair
market value determination for our common stock. During the
three months ended June 30, 2009, we did not exercise our
right of first refusal to repurchase any common stock; also,
during this period, there were no transactions in our stock in
which we chose not to exercise our right of first refusal.
August 7, 2009. On August 7, 2009,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $9.01 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
June 30, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount
of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 20%, an estimated time
to an initial public offering of more than 12 months and an
estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of 12 months.
The expected outcomes were weighted 50% toward an initial public
offering, 30% towards a strategic merger or sale, 18% towards
remaining a private company and 2% towards a liquidation
scenario. This valuation indicated a fair value of $9.00 per
share for our common stock. During the three months ended
September 30, 2009, we exercised our right of first refusal
to repurchase 71,895 shares of common stock at an average
price of $8.03, with a low price of $7.00 and a high price of
$8.80. During this same period, we chose not to exercise our
right of first refusal for transactions totaling
144,583 shares of common stock at an average price of
$8.09, with a low price of $8.00 and a high price of $8.50.
Prior to the issuance of our financial statements for the three
month period ended September 30, 2009 in connection with
the initial filing of our registration statement on
Form S-1,
we decided to revise our estimate of fair value of our common
stock as of August 7, 2009. In reassessing the estimate of
fair value of our common stock, we considered the preliminary
estimated valuation range communicated by our underwriters as
well as the results of our contemporaneous valuation performed
on November 17, 2009, immediately prior to the initial
filing of our registration statement on
Form S-1.
The revised fair value as of August 7, 2009 was derived
based on a linear increase of our valuation between
April 29, 2008 (date of our last fair value determination
prior to issuance of our audited financial statements) and
November 17, 2009 (date of our initial filing of our
registration statement on
Form S-1).
We also compared the results of the calculation described above
with an estimate of fair value as of August 7, 2009 based
on the estimated fair value at November 17, 2009 adjusted
for the increase of the NASDAQ composite index between these two
dates, and noted no material differences. As a result of
reassessing the fair value of our common stock, we will be
recording additional compensation expense, excluding the effect
of forfeitures, of $8.1 million, of which $0.4 million
was recorded in our financial statements for the three months
ended September 30, 2009.
45
October 6, 2009. On October 6, 2009,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $11.08 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
September 15, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 15%, an
estimated time to an initial public offering of less than
9 months and an estimated time to a strategic merger or
sale of more than 12 months. The expected outcomes were
weighted 50% toward an initial public offering, 30% towards a
strategic merger or sale, 18% towards remaining a private
company and 2% towards a liquidation scenario. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $11.08 per share for our common stock.
Consistent with our August 7, 2009 grant, we reassessed the
fair value of our common stock as of October 6, 2007. Given
the relatively immaterial number of shares issued, we derived
the revised estimate of fair value as of October 6, 2009
assuming a linear increase of our valuation between
April 29, 2009 and November 17, 2009. We will be
recording compensation expense associated with the
October 6, 2009 grants of $955,000 through the end of
fiscal year 2010.
Significant events occurring between the October 6, 2009
and November 17, 2009 grants. Subsequent to
the October 6, 2009 board of directors meeting, we
initiated a process to evaluate underwriters for a potential
initial public offering. On November 2, 2009, our board of
directors approved managements recommendation of an
underwriting group and its recommendation to attempt an initial
public offering on an accelerated time line. On November 5,
2009, management, the underwriters, Qatalyst Partners, our
independent registered public accounting firm and external legal
counsel for the company and the underwriters held an
organizational meeting to formally begin the initial
public offering process and the process of underwriter due
diligence.
November 17, 2009. On November 17,
2009, our board of directors determined a fair value of our
common stock of $19.00 per share, based on a contemporaneous
valuation report dated October 31, 2009 and the preliminary
estimated valuation range communicated by our underwriters. The
valuation used a risk-adjusted discount of 15%, a
non-marketability discount of 5%, an estimated time to an
initial public offering of less than 4 months and an
estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 80% toward
an initial public offering, 10% towards a strategic merger or
sale and 10% towards remaining a private company. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $17.87 per share for our common stock.
We determined the fair value per share of our common stock to be
$19.00 as of November 17, 2009, which was higher than the
$17.87 per share value indicated by our valuation analysis as of
October 31, 2009, based upon preliminary indications of
potential pricing ranges for our initial public offering. We
will be recording compensation expense associated with the
November 17, 2009 grants of $3.3 million through the
end of fiscal year 2010.
Recoverability
of Intangible Assets, Including Goodwill
Intangible assets consist primarily of content, domain names,
customer and publisher relationships, non-compete agreements,
and other intangible assets. Intangible assets acquired in a
business combination are measured at fair value at the date of
acquisition. We amortize all intangible assets on a straight
line basis over their expected lives. As of June 30, 2009
and September 30, 2009, we had $106.7 million and
$119.5 million of goodwill, respectively, and
$34.0 million and $36.6 million of other intangible
assets, respectively, with estimable useful lives on our
consolidated balance sheets.
We review our indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment
at least annually or as indicators of impairment exist based on
comparing the fair value of the asset to the carrying value of
the asset. Goodwill is currently our only indefinite-lived
intangible asset. We perform our annual goodwill impairment test
in the fourth quarter for each of our DMS and DSS reporting
units. Our goodwill impairment test requires the use of
fair-value techniques, which are inherently subjective.
We performed our goodwill impairment test on our DMS reporting
unit by comparing the fair value of the business enterprise as
adjusted for the value of the DSS reporting unit to its carrying
value. The business enterprise value as a whole calculated on
April 20, 2009 for our goodwill impairment test in the
fourth quarter of 2009 differs from the implied market
capitalization based on the fair value of an individual share of
our common stock used for granting stock options as
March 31, 2009, as described below under
Managements
46
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Estimates
Stock-Based Compensation, because the business enterprise
value is the estimated value that would be received for the sale
of the company as a whole in an orderly transaction between
market participants, whereas the estimated value used to
determine the fair value of an individual share of common stock
was determined on the basis of a non-marketable minority share
of a non-public company. The calculation of the non-marketable
minority interest of an individual share takes into
consideration interest bearing debt, the fair value of stock
options issued, shares outstanding and a marketability discount
on common stock that is not freely tradable in a public market.
Fair value of our DSS reporting unit was estimated in April 2009
using the income approach. Under the income approach, we
calculated the fair value of our DSS reporting unit based on the
present value of estimated future cash flows.
The valuation of goodwill could be affected if actual results
differ substantially from our estimates. Circumstances that
could affect the valuation of goodwill include, among other
things, a significant change in our business climate and buying
habits of our subscriber base along with increased costs to
provide systems and technologies required to support our content
and search capabilities. Based on our analysis in the fourth
quarter of 2009, no impairment of goodwill was indicated. We
have determined that a 10% change in our cash flow assumptions
or a marginal change in our discount rate as of the date of our
most recent goodwill impairment test would not have changed the
outcome of the test.
We evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-lived Assets, or SFAS 144.
SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment of long-lived
assets in the event that the net book value of such assets
exceeds the future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to
such assets. In accordance with SFAS 144, we recognize
impairment, if any, in the period of identification to the
extent the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the fair value of
such asset. Based on our analysis, no impairment was recorded in
fiscal year 2009.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statement of
operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
63,678
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
78,552
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
45,281
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
55,047
|
|
|
|
70.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
23,505
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4,837
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2009
Net
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
63,678
|
|
|
$
|
78,552
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
45,281
|
|
|
|
55,047
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Net revenue increased $14.9 million, or 23%, from the three
months ended September 30, 2008 to the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Substantially all of this increase was
attributable to an increase in revenue from our financial
services client vertical. Financial services client vertical net
revenue increased from $15.2 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 to $31.0 million in the
corresponding 2009 period, an increase of $15.8 million, or
104%. The increase in financial services client vertical revenue
was driven by lead and click volume increases at relatively
steady prices.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased $9.8 million, or 22%, from the
three months ended September 30, 2008 to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The increase in cost of revenue
was driven by a $9.3 million increase in media costs due to
lead and click volume increases. Gross margin, which is the
difference between net revenue and cost of revenue as a
percentage of net revenue, increased from 28.9% for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 to 29.9% for the three
months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in gross
margin is attributable to revenue growth of 23% from the three
months ended September 30, 2008 to the three months ended
September 30, 2009 in conjunction with a moderate
compensation expense increase of only 2% for the same period due
to a reduction in workforce in the third quarter of fiscal year
2009.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008-2009%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
3,757
|
|
|
$
|
4,470
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
11,752
|
|
|
$
|
11,536
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
Development Expenses
Product development expenses increased $713,000, or 19%, from
the three months ended September 30, 2008 to the three
months ended September 30, 2009. The increase is
attributable to increased performance bonuses and compensation
expense of $552,000 from the three months ended September 30,
2008 to the three months ended September 30, 2009 and, to a
lesser extent, increased stock-based compensation expense of
$92,000 and professional services fees of $89,000 associated
with the development of our technology platforms.
48
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses declined $634,000, or 15%, from the
three months ended September 30, 2008 to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The decline is due to a 23%
decrease in our sales and marketing headcount and related
compensation expenses of $769,000, partially offset by increased
stock-based compensation expense of $91,000. The decline in
headcount and related compensation expense is driven by a
reduction in workforce in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased $295,000, or 8%,
from the three months ended September 30, 2008 to the three
months ended September 30, 2009. The decline is driven by a
decrease in our legal expenses of $633,000 attributable to the
settlement of an ongoing legal matter in the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2009, partially offset by increased stock-based
compensation expense of $390,000.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008-2009%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(622
|
)
|
|
$
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net was flat from the three
months ended September 30, 2008, to the three months ended
September 2009. The decrease in interest income is due to a
decline in our invested cash balances. Other income (expense),
net increased $69,000, or 135%, from the three months ended
September 30, 2008 to the three months ended
September 30, 2009 due to the weakening of the
U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar.
Provision
for Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
$
|
2,719
|
|
|
$
|
4,837
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
45.1
|
%
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
The decline in our effective tax rate from the three months
ended September 30, 2008 to the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was impacted by decreased state income
tax expense in jurisdictions in which we no longer had a
physical presence, the unavailability of research and
development tax credits during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and, to a lesser extent, increased tax
deductions associated with employee stock option disqualifying
dispositions. The decline was offset by increased non-deductible
stock-based compensation expense.
Comparison
of Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009
Net
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
49
Net revenue increased $68.5 million, or 36%, from fiscal
year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, attributable primarily to an
increase in our financial services and education client
verticals, offset in part by a decline in our DSS business.
Financial services client vertical net revenue increased from
$21.9 million in fiscal year 2008 to $79.7 million in
fiscal year 2009, an increase of $57.8 million, or 264%.
Revenue growth in our financial services client vertical was
driven by lead and click volume increases at relatively steady
prices and the full effect of the acquisition of SureHits in the
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. Our education client
vertical net revenue increased from $142.2 million in
fiscal year 2008 to $151.4 million in fiscal year 2009, an
increase of $9.1 million, or 6%, half due to lead volume
increases and half due to pricing increases. Our other client
verticals net revenue increased from $24.3 million in
fiscal year 2008 to $26.3 million in fiscal year 2009, an
increase of $2.0 million, or 8%, due primarily to the full
effect of the acquisition of the assets of Vendorseek L.L.C.,
within our B2B client vertical in the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2008. The revenue increase in our other client verticals
was partially offset by declines in our home services client
vertical due to both a challenging economic environment and lack
of available consumer credit.
Net revenue increased $24.7 million, or 15%, from fiscal
year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, attributable primarily to
increases in our education, financial services and other client
verticals, partially offset by declines in our DSS business.
Education client vertical net revenue increased from
$131.0 million to $142.2 million, an increase of
$11.2 million, or 9%, due to lead volume increases at
relatively steady prices. Financial services client vertical net
revenue increased from $12.2 million to $21.9 million,
an increase of $9.7 million, or 80%. Revenue growth in our
financial services client vertical was driven by the acquisition
of SureHits in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. Net
revenue from our other client verticals increased from
$16.6 million in fiscal year 2007 to $24.3 million in
fiscal year 2008, an increase of $7.7 million, or 46%, due
to a $6.0 million increase in our home services client
vertical primarily resulting from the acquisition of
ReliableRemodeler in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 and,
to a lesser extent, organic growth.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased $50.7 million, or 39%, from
fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, driven by a $43.3 million
increase in media costs due to lead and click volume increases
and, to a lesser extent, increased amortization of
acquisition-related intangible assets of $4.2 million resulting
from acquisitions in fiscal years 2008 and 2009. Our gross
margin declined from 31.8% in fiscal year 2008 to 30.3% in
fiscal year 2009 due primarily to the acquisition of SureHits,
which is characterized by lower gross margins.
Cost of revenue increased $21.9 million, or 20%, from
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, driven by a
$14.0 million increase in media costs due to lead volume
increases and, to a lesser extent, increased personnel costs of
$2.7 million due to an 11% increase in average headcount
and related compensation expense increases, as well as increased
amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets resulting
from acquisitions in fiscal year 2008. Gross margin declined
from 34.9% in fiscal year 2007 to 31.8% in fiscal year 2008 due
to increases in both the above mentioned headcount and related
compensation expense (including stock-based compensation
expense), as well as increases in fixed costs, and increased
amortization of acquired intangible assets associated with
acquisitions during fiscal year 2008.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
14,094
|
|
|
$
|
14,051
|
|
|
$
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
34,021
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
|
$
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Product
Development Expenses
Product development expenses increased $836,000, or 6%, from
fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, due to increased
management performance bonuses and increased stock-based
compensation expense. The increased management performance
bonuses were paid in connection with our achievement of
specified financial metrics during fiscal year 2009 that were
not achieved in the corresponding prior year period, as well as
an increase in the number of individuals eligible for such
bonuses. The increase in product development expenses was
partially offset by a reduction in workforce in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009. Product development expenses
remained flat from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.7 million, or
30%, from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, due to increased
stock-based compensation expense of $1.2 million, increased
personnel costs of $888,000, increased consulting fees of
$340,000, increased advertising and marketing expenses
associated with marketing campaigns of $331,000 and increased
depreciation and amortization of $193,000. The increase in
personnel costs was due to an 18% increase in average headcount
and related compensation expenses driven by the acquisition of
ReliableRemodeler in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Increased consulting, advertising and marketing expenses was due
to overall increases in sales and marketing activities
associated with the increased volume of business in fiscal year
2009 as compared to the prior year period. The increase was
partially offset by a reduction in workforce in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.9 million, or
46%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, due to increased
personnel costs of $3.9 million driven by a 47% increase in
average headcount and a one-time payout of a management
retention bonus in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, and,
to a lesser extent, increased stock-based compensation expense.
The increase in personnel costs was driven by the acquisition of
ReliableRemodeler in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses remained relatively flat in
fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008. The slight
decline consisted of a decrease in legal expenses of $987,000,
partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation
expense of $741,000. The decline in legal expenses is
attributable to a decrease in expenses related to an ongoing
legal matter which was settled prior to the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2009. In connection with the settlement, we paid a
one-time, non-refundable fee of $850,000. We recognized an
intangible asset of $226,000 related to the estimated fair value
of the license and expensed the remaining $624,000 as a
settlement expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.9 million,
or 17%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. The increase
was driven by increased legal fees of $973,000 associated with
the legal matter discussed above, increased personnel costs of
$1.2 million due to a 6% increase in average headcount and
a one-time payout of management retention bonuses in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
|
$
|
1,482
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(83
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
192
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)%
|
|
|
(265
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
1,034
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)%
|
|
|
(957
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net declined
$4.0 million from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009 due
to increased interest expense, lowered interest income and
foreign currency losses. The increase in interest
51
expense is due to an increase in non-cash imputed interest on
acquisition-related notes payable and a draw down on our credit
facilities. Decreased interest income is due to a decline in our
invested cash balances. The decline in other income (expense),
net was due to foreign currency losses driven by weakening of
the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar.
Interest and other income (expense), net declined $621,000 from
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008 due to increased non-cash
imputed interest expense associated with an increase in
acquisition-related notes payable and the draw down on our
credit facilities, reduced interest income due to lower average
investment balances and declining average interest rates. The
increase in other income (expense), net relates to a change in
the functional currency of one of our subsidiaries and the
resulting reclassification of an unrealized currency translation
gain from other comprehensive income to other income (expense),
net.
Provision
for Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
$
|
9,828
|
|
|
$
|
8,876
|
|
|
$
|
13,909
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
The increase in our effective tax rate from fiscal year 2008 to
fiscal year 2009 was impacted by increased state income tax
expense in connection with our acquisitions of businesses in
various jurisdictions within the U.S. in which we did not
previously have a presence and, to a lesser extent, increased
foreign income taxes and non-deductible stock-based compensation
expense. The increase in our effective tax rate was partially
offset by increased research and development tax credits
recorded in connection with the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, or the Act. On October 3,
2008, the Act, which contains the Tax Extenders and
Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008 was signed into
law. Under the Act, the research credit was retroactively
extended for amounts paid or incurred after December 31,
2007 and before January 1, 2010.
The increase in our effective tax rate from fiscal year 2007 to
fiscal year 2008 was due to increased non-deductible stock-based
compensation expense and a decline in federal research and
development tax credits in fiscal year 2008 due to the
expiration of research and development credit laws in
December 31, 2007.
52
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
consolidated statements of operations data for the last three
quarters of fiscal year 2008, fiscal year 2009 and the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010. We have prepared the statements of
operations for each of these quarters on the same basis as the
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus and, in the opinion of the management, each
statement of operation includes all adjustments, consisting
solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
statement of the results of operations for these periods. This
information should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. These quarterly operating results
are not necessarily indicative of our operating results for any
future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
40,806
|
|
|
$
|
49,739
|
|
|
$
|
57,102
|
|
|
$
|
63,678
|
|
|
$
|
59,235
|
|
|
$
|
69,813
|
|
|
$
|
67,801
|
|
|
$
|
78,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
28,623
|
|
|
|
32,840
|
|
|
|
38,855
|
|
|
|
45,281
|
|
|
|
42,969
|
|
|
|
46,780
|
|
|
|
46,563
|
|
|
|
55,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
12,183
|
|
|
|
16,899
|
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
16,266
|
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
|
|
21,238
|
|
|
|
23,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
3,355
|
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
3,723
|
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,217
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,171
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
7,355
|
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
5,208
|
|
|
|
13,062
|
|
|
|
9,806
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
7,469
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
|
9,052
|
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
|
(5,818
|
)
|
|
|
(3,825
|
)
|
|
|
(4,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
4,670
|
|
|
$
|
4,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
5,227
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
4,425
|
|
|
$
|
10,336
|
|
|
$
|
13,099
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
10,957
|
|
|
$
|
18,571
|
|
|
$
|
15,188
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly
Revenue Trends
Our quarterly net revenue increased $8.9 million, or 22%,
from $40.8 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 to $49.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. For these respective periods,
our education client vertical revenue increased by
$4.4 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue increased by $1.1 million due to
organic growth; our other client verticals revenue increased by
$3.5 million due to growth in our home services client
vertical as a result of the acquisition of Reliable Remodeler
and organic growth; and our DSS business revenue was flat.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $7.4 million, or 15%,
from $49.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to $57.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008. For these respective periods, our
education client vertical revenue decreased by $193,000; our
financial services client vertical revenue increased by
$6.4 million due to the acquisition of SureHits and organic
growth; our other client verticals revenue increased by
$1.2 million due to growth in our home services client
vertical as a result of the acquisition of ReliableRemodeler;
and our DSS business revenue was flat.
53
Our quarterly net revenue increased $6.6 million, or 12%,
from $57.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 to $63.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. For these respective periods, our
education client vertical revenue increased by $2.2 million
due to organic growth; our financial services client vertical
revenue increased by $4.5 million due to organic growth;
our other client verticals revenue was flat and our DSS business
revenue decreased by $228,000.
Our quarterly net revenue decreased $4.4 million, or 7%,
from $63.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 to $59.2 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2008. For these respective
periods, our education client vertical revenue decreased by
$5.3 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue increased by $2.8 million due to
organic growth; our other client verticals revenue decreased by
$2.2 million due to a decline in our home services client
vertical as a result of difficult economic conditions; and our
DSS business revenues increase by $262,000.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $10.6 million, or 18%,
from $59.2 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 to $69.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. For these respective periods,
our education client vertical revenue increased by
$4.5 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue increased by $6.6 million due to
organic growth; our other client verticals revenue decreased by
$482,000; and our DSS business revenue was flat.
Our quarterly net revenue decreased $2.0 million, or 3%,
from $69.8 the three months ended March 31, 2009 to
$67.8 million the three months ended June 30, 2009.
For these respective periods, our education client vertical
revenue increased by $860,000; our financial services client
vertical revenue decreased by $2.6 million due to decreased
marketing spend by one of our clients; our other client
verticals revenue was flat and our DSS business revenue
decreased by $299,000.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $10.8 million, or 16%,
from $67.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 to $78.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. For these respective periods, our
education client vertical revenue increased by $938,000; our
financial services client vertical revenue increased by
$9.0 million due to organic growth; our other client
verticals revenue increased by $987,000; and our DSS business
revenue decreased by $194,000.
Adjusted
EBITDA
Our use of Adjusted EBITDA. We include
Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus because (i) we seek to
manage our business to a consistent level of Adjusted EBITDA as
a percentage of net revenue, (ii) it is a key basis upon
which our management assesses our operating performance,
(iii) it is one of the primary metrics investors use in
evaluating Internet marketing companies, (iv) it is a
factor in the evaluation of the performance of our management in
determining compensation, and (v) it is an element of
certain maintenance covenants under our debt agreements. We
define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less interest income plus
interest expense, provision for taxes, depreciation expense,
amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense and
foreign-exchange (loss) gain. Restructuring charges have not
been expensed and have not been adjusted for in our Adjusted
EBITDA.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure because we
believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from
period to period by excluding potential differences caused by
variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense),
tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of
changes in effective tax rates or fluctuations in permanent
differences or discrete quarterly items) and the impact of
depreciation and amortization expense on definite-lived
intangible assets. Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal
comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more
consistent basis, we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business
planning purposes, to incentivize and compensate our management
personnel and in evaluating acquisition opportunities.
In addition, we believe Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are
widely used by investors, securities analysts, ratings agencies
and other interested parties in our industry as a measure of
financial performance
54
and debt-service capabilities. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has
limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider
it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results
as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures for
capital equipment or other contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced
in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital
expenditure requirements for such replacements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive
impact of issuing equity-based compensation to our management
team and employees;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest
or principal payments on our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect certain tax payments that may
represent a reduction in cash available to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other companies, including companies in our industry, may
calculate Adjusted EBITDA measures differently, which reduces
their usefulness as a comparative measure.
|
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to
invest in the growth of our business. When evaluating our
performance, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other
financial performance measures, including various cash flow
metrics, net loss and our other GAAP results.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure, for each of the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
4,670
|
|
|
$
|
4,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
5,227
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
5,818
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
4,837
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,237
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
3,592
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
4,425
|
|
|
$
|
10,336
|
|
|
$
|
13,099
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
10,957
|
|
|
$
|
18,571
|
|
|
$
|
15,188
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA quarterly trends. We seek to
manage our business to a consistent level of Adjusted EBITDA as
a percentage of net revenue. We do so on a fiscal year basis by
varying our operations to balance revenue growth and costs
throughout the fiscal year. We do not seek to manage our
business to a consistent level of Adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly
basis. For fiscal years 2003 to 2009, Adjusted EBITDA as a
percentage of revenue was 22%, 20%, 22%, 23%, 22%, 19% and 22%,
respectively.
For quarterly periods from September 30, 2007 to
September 30, 2009, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
revenue was 19%, 11%, 21%, 23%, 19%, 18%, 27%, 22%, and 23%,
respectively. In general, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
revenue tends to be seasonally weaker in the quarters ending
September 30 and, particularly, December 31 and stronger in
quarters ending March 31 and June 30. For the three months
ended December 31, 2007, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
revenue was 11%. This was due to typical seasonal weakness and a
one-time management tenure bonus. For the three months ended
March 31, 2008, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue
was 27%. This was due to a reduction in work force undertaken at
the beginning of that period based on concerns held by our
management team regarding the deteriorating economic climate.
The economic climate did not have a negative effect on us in a
fashion that impacted our
55
revenue growth, and our reduced cost basis resulting from our
work force reduction, combined with our revenue growth, resulted
in an Adjusted EBITDA margin for the period that exceeded our
historical quarterly Adjusted EBITDA margin performance. We
manage our business to a desired Adjusted EBITDA margin level on
a fiscal year basis, not on a quarterly basis, and investors
should expect our Adjusted EBITDA margins to vary from quarter
to quarter.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary operating cash requirements include the payment of
media costs, personnel costs, costs of information technology
systems and office facilities.
Since our inception, we have financed our operations and
acquisitions primarily through cash flow from operations,
private placements of our convertible preferred stock and
borrowing under our bank credit facilities and seller notes. We
have generated approximately $138.3 million in cash flows
from operations and have received a total of approximately
$37.4 million from private share placements and an
additional $5.4 million from the exercise of stock options
to purchase shares of our common stock. Our principal sources of
liquidity as of September 30, 2009, consisted of cash and
cash equivalents of $28.1 million and our revolving credit
facility which had $57.3 million available for borrowing as
of such date.
Net
Cash Provided by or Used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $0.3 million in
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and net cash
provided by operating activities was $11.8 million in the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and
$25.2 million, $24.8 million and $32.6 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Our net cash
provided by or used in operating activities is primarily a
result of our net income adjusted by non-cash expenses such as
depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense,
provision for sales returns and changes in working capital
components, and is influenced by the timing of cash collections
from our clients and cash payments for purchases of media and
other expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the three months
ended September 30, 2009, was driven by net income of
$6.5 million, non-cash depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense of $6.2 million and an
increase in accrued liabilities of $4.2 million, moderated
by an increase in accounts receivable of $5.8 million. The
increase in accrued liabilities is due to timing of payments and
the overall growth of our business. The increase in accounts
receivable is attributable to increased revenue, as well as
timing of receipts.
Net cash used in operating activities in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 was impacted by an increase in accounts
receivable of $8.6 million, and to a lesser extent, a
decline in accrued liabilities of $1.9 million. The decline
was offset by net income of $3.3 million and non-cash
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense
of $5.5 million. The increase in accounts receivable is
attributable to increased revenue and timing of receipts. The
decline in accrued liabilities is due to timing of payments.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2009 was due
to net income of $17.3 million, non-cash depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense of
$22.2 million, moderated by an increase in accounts
receivable of $9.0 million and increased deferred tax
assets of $4.1 million. The increase in accounts receivable
is due to increased revenue of 36% associated with the growth of
our business, as well as due to timing of receipts. The increase
in deferred tax assets is due to temporary differences between
the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of
existing assets and liabilities.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2008 was due
to net income of $12.9 million, non-cash depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense of
$14.9 million and increased accounts payable and accrued
liabilities of $3.0 million, moderated by an increase in
deferred tax assets of $3.8 million and excess tax benefits
from exercise of stock options of $1.7 million. The
increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is due to
timing of payments. The increase in deferred tax assets is due
to temporary differences between the financial statement
carrying amount and the tax basis of existing assets and
liabilities.
56
The increase in excess tax benefits is attributable to
exercises of stock options resulting in tax deductions in excess
of recorded stock-based compensation expense.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2007 was
largely due to net income of $15.6 million and non-cash
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense
of $11.7 million.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Our investing activities include acquisitions of media websites
and businesses; purchases, sales and maturities of marketable
securities; capital expenditures; and capitalized internal
development costs. Net cash used in investing activities was
$11.2 million and $12.5 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and was
$26.4 million, $49.2 million and $27.3 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Capital
expenditures and internal software development costs totaled
$0.9 million and $0.8 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$3.5 million, $3.6 million and $2.4 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Cash used in investing activities in the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was impacted by the acquisition of
Payler Corp. D/B/A HSH Associates Financial Publishers, or HSH,
a New Jersey-based online company providing comprehensive
mortgage rate information for an initial $6.0 million cash
payment, as well as by purchases of the operations of 12 other
website publishing businesses for an aggregate of approximately
$4.6 million in cash payments.
Cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2009 was
impacted by the acquisition of U.S. Citizens for Fair Credit
Card Terms, Inc, or CardRatings, for an initial cash payment of
$10.4 million, as well as purchases of the operations of 33
other website publishing businesses for an aggregate of
approximately $14.6 million in cash payments. Cash used in
investing activities in fiscal year 2008 was driven by the
acquisitions of SureHits, ReliableRemodeler and Vendorseek
amounting to total cash payments of $54.7 million, as well
as purchases of the operations of 20 website publishing
businesses for an aggregate of approximately $9.5 million
in cash payments. Cash used in investing activities in fiscal
year 2008 was partially offset by proceeds from sales and
maturities of marketable securities, net of purchases of
marketable securities, of $17.5 million. Cash used in
investing activities in fiscal year 2007 was driven by purchases
of the operations of 32 website publishing businesses for an
aggregate of approximately $11.8 million in cash payments,
as well as purchases of marketable securities, net of proceeds
from sales and maturities or marketable securities, of
$11.0 million.
Net
Cash Provided by or Used in Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $3.6 million and
$6.9 million in the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Cash provided by financing
activities in the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
due to proceeds from a draw down of our revolving credit
facility of $6.5 million, partially offset by
$3.3 million in principal payments on acquisition-related
notes payable and our term loan, as well as repurchases of our
common stock.
Cash used in financing activities was $5.0 million and
$2.8 million in fiscal years 2009 and 2007, respectively,
and cash provided by financing activities was $22.8 million
in fiscal year 2008. Cash used in financing activities in fiscal
year 2009 was due to principal payments on acquisition-related
notes payable and our term loan of $13.1 million and stock
repurchases of $1.3 million, partially offset by proceeds
from a draw down of our revolving credit facility of
$8.6 million. Cash provided by financing activities in
fiscal year 2008 was driven by proceeds from our term loan of
$29.0 million and proceeds from issuance of common stock as
a result of stock option exercises of $2.6 million,
partially offset by $5.6 million in stock repurchases and
principal payments on acquisition-related notes payable of
$4.9 million. Cash used in financing activities in fiscal
year 2007 was driven by principal payments on
acquisition-related notes payable of $3.9 million,
partially offset by proceeds from issuance of common stock as a
result of stock option exercises of $0.7 million.
57
Capital
Resources
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, funds generated
from our operations and available amounts under our credit
facilities, together with the net proceeds of this offering,
will be sufficient to meet our working capital and
non-acquisition related capital expenditure requirements for at
least the next 12 months. In order to expand our business
or acquire additional complementary businesses or technologies,
we may need to raise additional funds through equity or debt
financings. If required, additional financing may not be
available on terms that are favorable to us, if at all. If we
raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or
convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our
stockholders will be reduced and these securities might have
rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our
current stockholders. No assurance can be given that additional
financing will be available or that, if available, such
financing can be obtained on terms favorable to our stockholders
and us.
During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have
not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect
that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
During the periods presented, we did not have any relationships
with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as
entities often referred to as structured finance or special
purpose entities, which would have been established for the
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purpose.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at
June 30, 2009 and the effect such obligations are expected
to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
|
3 to 5 Years
|
|
|
More Than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
34,757
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,250
|
|
|
$
|
20,507
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
25,069
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,194
|
|
|
$
|
14,318
|
|
|
$
|
23,519
|
|
|
$
|
23,357
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of SureHits, we also may be
required to make certain earn-out payments in the aggregate
amount of $13.5 million, payable in increments in the
amount of $4.5 million annually on January 1 of 2010, 2011
and 2012, contingent upon the achievement of specified financial
targets. In November 2009, we acquired the website assets of the
Internet.com division of WebMediaBrands, Inc. for $16.0 million
in cash and a $2.0 million non-interest bearing, unsecured
promissory note.
In August 2006, we entered into a loan and security agreement
which makes available a $30 million revolving credit
facility from a financial institution. In January 2008, we
signed an amendment to this loan and security agreement,
expanding the revolving credit availability to $60 million.
In September 2008, we replaced our existing revolving credit
facility of $60 million with credit facilities totaling
$100 million and in November 2009, we extended that
capacity to $130 million. The facilities consist of a
$30 million five-year term loan, with principal
amortization of 10%, 10%, 20%, 25% and 35% annually, and a
$100 million revolving credit facility. Pursuant to the
terms of the credit facility, we are required to use a portion
of the net cash proceeds from this offering to repay the
outstanding balance of our term loan. We may also repay the
remaining balance of the term loan and some or all of our
revolving credit facility from the proceeds of this offering.
Borrowings under the credit facilities are collateralized by our
assets and interest is payable quarterly at specified margins
above either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. The interest rate varies
dependent upon the ratio of funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and
ranges from LIBOR + 1.875% to 2.625% or
58
Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the revolving credit facility and
from LIBOR + 2.25% to 3.0% or Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the
term loan. Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our bank credit
facility, is substantially similar to our measure of Adjusted
EBITDA set forth under Prospectus Summary
Summary Consolidated Financial Data. As of
September 30, 2009, $27.8 million was outstanding
under the term loan and $12.8 million was outstanding under
the revolving credit facility. The credit facilities expire in
September 2013. Under the loan and revolving credit facility
agreement, we are required to maintain certain minimum financial
ratios computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Quick ratio: ratio of (a) the sum of unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents and trade receivables less than 90 days
from invoice date to (b) current liabilities and face
amount of any letters of credit less the current portion of
deferred revenue.
|
|
|
|
Fixed charge coverage: ratio of (a) trailing 12 months
of adjusted EBITDA to (b) the sum of capital expenditures,
net cash interest expense, cash taxes, cash dividends and
trailing 12 months payments of indebtedness. Payment of
unsecured indebtedness is excluded to the degree that sufficient
unused revolving credit facility exists such that the relevant
debt payment could have been made from the credit facility.
|
|
|
|
Funded debt to adjusted EBITDA: ratio of (a) the sum of all
obligations owing to lending institutions, the face amount of
any letters of credit, indebtedness owing in connection with
seller notes and indebtedness owing in connection with capital
lease obligations to (b) trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA.
|
We were in compliance with these minimum financial ratios as of
June 30, 2008 and 2009 and as of September 30, 2009.
The operating lease obligations reflected in the table above
primarily include our corporate office leases.
The notes payable reflected in the table above consist of
non-interest-bearing, unsecured promissory notes issued in
connection with acquisitions.
Guarantees
We have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and
directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or
director is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity.
The term of the indemnification period is for the officer or
directors lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future
payments we could be required to make under these
indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have a
director and officer insurance policy that limits our exposure
and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
As a result of our insurance policy coverage, we believe the
estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is
minimal. Accordingly, we have not recorded any liabilities for
these agreements.
In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into standard
indemnification provisions in our agreements with our clients.
Pursuant to these provisions, we indemnify our clients for
losses suffered or incurred in connection with certain
third-party claims that our product infringed any United States
patent, copyright or other intellectual property rights. Where
applicable, we generally limit such infringement indemnities to
those claims directed solely to our products and not in
combination with other software or products. With respect to our
DSS products, we also generally reserve the right to resolve
such claims by designing a non-infringing alternative or by
obtaining a license on reasonable terms, and failing that, to
terminate our relationship with the client. Subject to these
limitations, the term of such indemnity provisions are generally
coterminous with the corresponding agreements.
The potential amount of future payments to defend lawsuits or
settle indemnified claims under these indemnification provisions
may be unlimited; however, we believe the estimated fair value
of these indemnity provisions is minimal, and accordingly, we
have not recorded any liabilities for these agreements.
59
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued a new accounting standard that changes the
accounting for business combinations, including the measurement
of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business
combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the
accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the
recognition of capitalized in-process research and development,
the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost
accruals, the treatment of acquisition-related transaction costs
and the recognition of changes in the acquirers income tax
valuation allowance. The new standard applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of
the new standard did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements, but is likely to have a
material impact on how we account for any future business
combinations into which we may enter.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. In particular, the new standard
sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date
during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate
events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition
or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. We applied the requirement of this
standard effective June 30, 2009 and included additional
disclosures in the notes to our consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
provides for a codification of accounting standards to be the
authoritative source of generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. We adopted the provisions of the
authoritative accounting guidance for the interim reporting
period ended September 30, 2009. The adoption did not have
a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
In October 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
changes the accounting for arrangements with multiple
deliverables. Specifically, the new standard requires an entity
to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of an
arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative
selling prices. In addition, the new standard eliminates the use
of the residual method of allocation and requires the
relative-selling-price method in all circumstances in which an
entity recognizes revenue for an arrangement with multiple
deliverables. In October 2009, the FASB also issued a new
accounting standard that changes revenue recognition for
tangible products containing software and hardware elements.
Specifically, if certain requirements are met, revenue
arrangements that contain tangible products with software
elements that are essential to the functionality of the products
are scoped out of the existing software revenue recognition
accounting guidance and will be accounted for under the
multiple-element arrangements revenue recognition guidance
discussed above. Both standards will be effective for us in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2011. Early adoption is permitted.
We do not anticipate the adoption of these standards to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
To date, our international client agreements have been
denominated solely in U.S. dollars, and accordingly, we
have not been exposed to foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations related to client agreements, and do not currently
engage in foreign currency hedging transactions. However, as the
local accounts for our India and Canada operations are
maintained in the local currency of India and Canada, we are
subject to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
associated with remeasurement to U.S. dollars. A
hypothetical change of 10% in foreign currency exchange rates
would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
60
Interest
Rate Risk
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
totaling $28.1 million, $25.2 million and
$27.3 million at September 30, 2009, June 30,
2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. These amounts were
invested primarily in money market funds, short-term deposits
and marketable securities with original maturities of less than
three months. The unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments are held for working capital purposes and
short-term acquisitions financing. We do not enter into
investments for trading or speculative purposes. We believe that
we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair
value as a result of changes in interest rates due to the
short-term nature of our cash equivalents and short-term
investments. Declines in interest rates, however, would reduce
future investment income.
We have outstanding a credit facility consisting of term loan,
with principal amortization of 10%, 10%, 20%, 25% and 35%
annually, and a $100 million revolving credit facility. As
of September 30, 2009, we had $27.8 million
outstanding on our term loan and $12.8 million outstanding
on our revolving credit facility. Interest on the credit
facility is payable quarterly at specified margins above either
LIBOR or the Prime Rate. The interest rate varies dependent upon
the ratio of funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and ranges from
LIBOR + 1.875% to 2.625% or Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the
revolving credit facility and from LIBOR + 2.25% to 3.0% or
Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the term loan. A hypothetical change
of 1% in the interest rate on our credit facility would lead to
higher interest expense, but we do not believe it would
materially affect our overall consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
61
BUSINESS
Our
Company
QuinStreet is a leader in vertical marketing and media on the
Internet. We have built a strong set of capabilities to engage
Internet visitors with targeted media and to connect our
marketing clients with their potential customers online. We
focus on serving clients in large, information-intensive
industry verticals where relevant, targeted media and offerings
help visitors make informed choices, find the products that
match their needs, and thus become qualified customer prospects
for our clients. Our current primary client verticals are the
education and financial services industries. We also have a
presence in the home services,
business-to-business,
or B2B, and healthcare industries.
We generate revenue by delivering measurable online marketing
results to our clients. These results are typically in the form
of qualified leads or clicks, the outcomes of customer prospects
submitting requests for information on, or to be contacted
regarding, client products, or their clicking on or through to
specific client offers. These qualified leads or clicks are
generated from our marketing activities on our websites or on
third-party websites with whom we have relationships. Clients
primarily pay us for leads that they can convert into customers,
typically in a call center or through other offline customer
acquisition processes, or for clicks from our websites that they
can convert into applications or customers on their websites. We
are predominantly paid on a negotiated or market-driven
per lead or per click basis. Media costs
to generate qualified leads or clicks are borne by us as a cost
of providing our services.
Founded in 1999, we have been a pioneer in the development and
application of measurable marketing on the Internet. Clients pay
us for the actual opt-in actions by prospects or customers that
result from our marketing activities on their behalf, versus
traditional impression-based advertising and marketing models in
which an advertiser pays for more general exposure to an
advertisement. We have been particularly focused on developing
and delivering measurable marketing results in the search engine
ecosystem, the entry point of the Internet for most
of the visitors we convert into qualified leads or clicks for
our clients. We own or partner with vertical content websites
that attract Internet visitors from organic search engine
rankings due to the quality and relevancy of their content to
search engine users. We also acquire targeted visitors for our
websites through the purchase of
pay-per-click,
or PPC, advertisements on search engines. We complement search
engine companies by building websites with content and offerings
that are relevant and responsive to their searchers, and by
increasing the value of the PPC search advertising they sell by
matching visitors with offerings and converting them into
customer prospects for our clients.
Market
Opportunity
Our clients are shifting more of their marketing budgets from
traditional media channels such as direct mail, television,
radio, and newspapers to the Internet because of increasing
usage of the Internet by their potential customers. We believe
that direct marketing is the most applicable and relevant
marketing segment to us because it is targeted and measurable.
According to the July 2009 research report, Consumer
Behavior Online: A 2009 Deep Dive, by Forrester Research,
Americans spend 33% of their time with media on the Internet,
but online direct marketing represented only 16% of the
$149 billion in total annual U.S. direct marketing
spending in 2009, as reported by the Direct Marketing
Association. The Internet is an effective direct marketing
medium due to its targeting and measurability characteristics.
If direct marketing budgets shift to the Internet in proportion
to Americans share of time spent with media on the
Internet from 16% to 33% of the $149 billion in
total spending that could represent an increased
market opportunity of $25 billion. In addition, as
traditional media categories such as television and radio shift
from analog to digital formats, they can become channels for the
targeted and measurable marketing techniques and capabilities we
have developed for the Internet, thus expanding our addressable
market opportunity. Further future market potential will also
come from international markets.
62
Change
in marketing strategy and approach
We believe that marketing approaches are changing as budgets
shift from offline, analog advertising media to digital
advertising media such as Internet marketing. These changing
approaches are fundamental, and require a shift to fundamentally
new competencies, including:
From
qualitative, impression-driven marketing to analytic,
data-driven marketing
We believe that the growth in Internet marketing is enabling a
more data-driven approach to advertising. The measurability of
online marketing allows marketers to collect a significant
amount of detailed data on the performance of their marketing
campaigns, including the effectiveness of ad format and
placement and user responses. This data can then be analyzed and
used to improve marketing campaign performance and
cost-effectiveness on substantially shorter cycle times than
with traditional offline media.
From
account management-based client relationships to results-based
client relationships
We believe that marketers are becoming increasingly focused on
strategies that deliver specific, measurable results. For
example, marketers are attempting to better understand how their
marketing spending produces measurable objectives such as
meeting their target marketing cost per new customer. As
marketers adopt more results-based approaches, the basis of
client relationships with their marketing services providers is
shifting from being more account management-based to being more
results-oriented.
From
marketing messages pushed on audiences to marketing messages
pulled by self-directed audiences
Traditional marketing messages such as television and radio
advertisements are broadcast to a broad audience. The Internet
is enabling more self-directed and targeted marketing. For
example, when Internet visitors click on PPC search
advertisements, they are expressing an interest in and
proactively engaging with information about a product or service
related to that advertisement. The growth of self-directed
marketing, primarily through online channels, allows marketers
to present more targeted and potentially more relevant marketing
messages to potential customers who have taken the first step in
the buying process, which can in turn increase the effectiveness
of marketers spending.
From
marketing spending focused on large media buys to marketing
spending optimized for fragmented media
We believe that media is becoming increasingly fragmented and
that marketing strategies are changing to adapt to this trend.
There are millions of Internet websites, tens of thousands of
which have significant numbers of visitors. While this
fragmentation can create challenges for marketers, it also
allows for improved audience segmentation and the delivery of
highly targeted marketing messages, but new technologies and
approaches are necessary to effectively manage marketing given
the increasing complexity resulting from more media
fragmentation.
Increasing
complexity of online marketing
Online marketing is a dynamic and increasingly complex
advertising medium. There are numerous online channels for
marketers to reach potential customers, including search
engines, Internet portals, vertical content websites, affiliate
networks, display and contextual ad networks, email, video
advertising, and social media. We refer to these and other
marketing channels as media. Each of these channels may involve
multiple ad formats and different pricing models, amplifying the
complexity of online marketing. We believe that this complexity
increases the demand for our vertical marketing and media
services due to our capabilities and to our experience managing
and optimizing online marketing programs across multiple
channels. Also marketers and agencies often lack our ability to
aggregate offerings from multiple clients in the same industry
vertical, an approach that allows us to cover a wide selection
of visitor segments and provide more potential matches to
Internet visitor needs. This approach can allow us to convert
more Internet visitors into qualified leads or clicks from
targeted media sources, giving us an advantage when buying or
monetizing that media.
63
Our
Business Model
We deliver cost-effective marketing results to our clients,
predictably and scalably, most typically in the form of a
qualified lead or click. These leads or clicks can then convert
into a customer or sale for the client at a rate that results in
an acceptable marketing cost to them. We get paid by clients
primarily when we deliver qualified leads or clicks as defined
in our agreements. Because we bear the costs of media, our
programs must deliver a value to our clients and a media yield,
or our ability to generate an acceptable margin on our media
costs, that provides a sound financial outcome for us. Our
general process is:
|
|
|
|
|
We own or access targeted media.
|
|
|
|
We run advertisements or other forms of marketing messages and
programs in that media to create visitor responses or clicks
through to client offerings.
|
|
|
|
We match these responses or clicks to client offerings or brands
that meet visitor interests or needs, converting visitors into
qualified leads or clicks.
|
|
|
|
We optimize client matches and media yield such that we achieve
desired results for clients and a sound financial outcome for us.
|
Media cost, or the cost to attract targeted Internet visitors,
is the largest cost input to producing the measurable marketing
results we deliver to clients. Balancing our clients cost
and conversion objectives, or the rate at which the leads or
clicks that we deliver to them convert into customers, with our
media costs and yield objectives, represents the primary
challenge in our business model. We have been able to
effectively balance these competing demands by focusing on our
media sources and capabilities, conversion optimization, and our
mix of offerings and client coverage. We also seek to mitigate
media cost risk by working with third-party website publishers
predominantly on a revenue-share basis; media purchased on a
non-revenue-share basis has represented a small minority of our
media costs and of the Internet visitors we convert into
qualified leads or clicks for clients.
Media
and Internet visitor mix
We are a client-driven organization. We seek to be one of the
largest providers of measurable marketing results on the
Internet in the client industry verticals we serve by meeting
the needs of clients for results, reliability and volume.
Meeting those client needs requires that we maintain a
diversified and flexible mix of Internet visitor sources due to
the dynamic nature of online media. Our media mix changes with
changes in Internet visitor usage patterns. We adapt to those
changes on an ongoing basis, and also proactively adjust our mix
of vertical media sources to respond to client or
vertical-specific circumstances and to achieve our financial
objectives. Our financial objectives are to achieve consistent,
sustainable financial performance, but can differ by client or
industry vertical, depending on factors such as our need to
invest in the development of media sources, marketing programs,
or client relationships. Generally, our Internet visitor sources
include:
|
|
|
|
|
websites owned and operated by us, with content and offerings
that are relevant to our clients target customers;
|
|
|
|
visitors acquired from PPC advertisements purchased on major
search engines and sent to our websites;
|
|
|
|
revenue sharing agreements with third-party websites with whom
we have a relationship and whose content is relevant to our
clients target customers;
|
|
|
|
email lists owned by third parties and warranted to us by their
owners to comply with the CAN-SPAM Act;
|
|
|
|
email lists owned by us, and generated on an
opt-in basis
from Internet visitors to our websites; and
|
|
|
|
display ads run through online advertising networks or directly
with major websites or portals.
|
64
Conversion
optimization
Once we acquire targeted Internet visitors from any of our
numerous online media sources, we seek to convert that media
into qualified leads or clicks at a rate that balances client
results with our media costs or yield objectives. We start by
defining the segments and interests of Internet visitors in our
verticals, and by providing them with the information and
product offerings on our websites and in our marketing programs
that best meet their needs. Achieving acceptable client results
and media yield then requires ongoing testing, measuring,
analysis, feedback, and adaptation of the key components of our
Internet marketing programs. These components include the
marketing or advertising messaging, content mix, visitor
navigation path, mix and coverage of client offerings presented,
and point-of-sale conversion messaging the content
that is presented to an Internet visitor immediately prior to
converting that individual into a lead or click for our clients.
This data complexity is managed by us with technology, data
reporting, marketing processes, and personnel. We believe that
our scale and ten-year track record give us an advantage, as
managing this complexity often implies a steep experience-based
learning curve.
Offerings
and client coverage
The Internet is a self-directed medium. Internet visitors choose
the websites they visit and their online navigation paths, and
always have the option of clicking away to a different website
or web page. Having offerings or clients that match the
interests or needs of website visitors is key to providing
results and adequate media yield. Our vertical focus allows us
to continuously revise and improve this matching process, to
better understand the various segments of visitors and client
offerings available to be matched, and to ensure that we enable
Internet visitors to find what they seek.
Our
Competitive Advantages
Vertical
focus and expertise
We focus our efforts on large, attractive market verticals, and
on building our depth of media and coverage of clients and
client offerings within them. We have been a pioneer in
developing vertical marketing and media on the Internet, and in
providing measureable marketing results to clients. We focus on
clients who are moving their marketing spending to measurable
online formats and on information-intensive verticals with large
underlying market opportunities and high product or customer
lifetime values. This focus allows us to utilize targeted media,
in-depth industry and client knowledge, and customer
segmentation and breadth of client offerings, or coverage, to
deliver results for our clients and greater media yield.
Measurable
marketing experience and expertise
We have substantial experience at designing and deploying
marketing programs that allow Internet visitors to find the
information or product offerings they seek, and that can deliver
economically attractive, measurable results to our clients,
cost-effectively for us. Such results require frequent testing
and balancing of numerous variables, including Internet visitor
sources, mix of content and of client and product offerings,
visitor navigation paths, prospect qualification, and
advertising creative design, among others. The complexity of
executing these marketing campaigns is challenging. Due to our
scale and ten-year track record, we have successfully executed
thousands of Internet marketing programs, and we have gained
significant experience managing and optimizing this complexity
to meet our clients volume, quality and cost objectives.
Targeted
media
Targeted media attracts Internet visitors who are relatively
narrowly focused demographically or in their interests. Targeted
media can deliver better measurable marketing results for our
clients, at lower media costs for us, due to higher rates of
conversion of Internet visitors into leads or clicks for
targeted offerings and, often, due to less competition from
display advertisers. We have significant experience at creating,
identifying, monetizing, and managing targeted media on the
Internet. Many of the targeted media sources for our marketing
programs are proprietary or more defensible because of our
direct ownership of websites in our verticals, our acquisition
of targeted Internet visitors directly from search engines to
our websites, and our exclusive or long-term relationships
65
with media properties or sources owned by others. Examples of
websites that we own and operate include WorldWideLearn.com,
ArmyStudyGuide.com and Chef2Chef.com in our education client
vertical; CardRatings.com, MoneyRates.com and Insure.com in our
financial services client vertical; AllAboutLawns.com and
OldHouseWeb.com in our home services client vertical; and
ElderCarelink.com in our healthcare client vertical.
Proprietary
technology
We have developed a core technology platform and a common set of
applications for managing and optimizing measurable marketing
programs across multiple verticals at scale. The primary
objectives and effects of our technologies are to achieve higher
media yield, deliver better results for our clients, and more
efficiently and effectively manage our scale and complexity. We
continuously strive to develop technologies that allow us to
better match Internet visitors in our verticals to the
information, clients or product offerings they seek at scale. In
so doing, our technologies can allow us to simultaneously
improve visitor satisfaction, increase our media yield, and
achieve higher rates of conversions of leads or clicks for our
clients a virtuous cycle of increased value for
Internet visitors and our clients and competitive advantage for
us. Some of the key applications in our technology platform are:
|
|
|
|
|
an ad server for tracking the placement and performance of
content, creative messaging, and offerings on our websites and
on those of publishers with whom we work;
|
|
|
|
database-driven applications for dynamically matching content,
offers or brands to Internet visitors expressed needs or
interests;
|
|
|
|
a platform for measuring and managing the performance of tens of
thousands of PPC search engine advertising campaigns;
|
|
|
|
dashboards or reporting tools for displaying operating and
financial metrics for thousands of ongoing marketing campaigns;
and,
|
|
|
|
a compliance tool capable of cataloging and filtering content
from the thousands of websites on which our marketing programs
appear to ensure adherence to client branding guidelines and to
regulatory requirements.
|
Approximately one-third of our employees are engineers, focused
on building, maintaining and operating our technology platform.
Client
relationships
We believe we are a reliable source of measurably effective
marketing results for our clients. We endeavor to work
collaboratively and in a data-driven way with clients to improve
our results for them. Our client retention rate is high. We
experienced no attrition among clients that individually
accounted for over $100,000 in monthly revenue to us for the
one-year period ended September 30, 2009. Those clients
represented 75% of our revenue over that time period. In
addition, most of our revenue growth comes from existing
clients; 88% of our
year-over-year
revenue growth in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 came
from incremental revenue from existing clients, defined as
clients we had worked with for at least one year. We believe our
high client retention and per client growth rates are due to:
|
|
|
|
|
our close, often direct, relationships with most of our large
clients;
|
|
|
|
our ability to deliver measurable and attractive return on
investment, or ROI, on clients marketing spending;
|
|
|
|
our ownership of, or exclusive access to large amounts of,
targeted media inventory and associated Internet visitors in the
industry verticals on which we focus; and,
|
|
|
|
our ability to consistently and reliably deliver large
quantities of qualified leads or clicks.
|
66
We believe that our high client retention rates, combined with
our depth and breadth of online media in our primary client
verticals, indicate that we are becoming an important marketing
channel partner for our clients to reach their prospective
customers.
Client-driven
online marketing approach
We focus on providing measurable Internet marketing and media
services to our clients in a way that protects and enhances
their brands and their relationships with prospective customers.
The Internet marketing programs we execute are designed to
adhere to strict client branding and regulatory guidelines, and
are designed to match our clients brands and offers with
expressed customer interest. We have contractual arrangements
with third-party website publishers to ensure that they follow
our clients brand guidelines, and we utilize our
proprietary technologies and trained personnel to help ensure
compliance. In addition, we believe that providing relevant,
helpful content and client offers that match an Internet
visitors self-selected interest in a product or service,
such as requesting information about an education program or
financial product, makes that visitor more likely to convert
into a customer for our clients.
We do not engage in online marketing practices such as spyware
or deceptive promotions that do not provide value to Internet
visitors and that can undermine our clients brands. A
small minority of our Internet visitors reach our websites or
client offerings through advertisements in emails. We employ
practices to ensure that we comply with the CAN-SPAM Act
governing unsolicited commercial email.
Acquisition
strategy and success
We have successfully acquired vertical marketing and media
companies on the Internet, including vertical website
businesses, marketing services companies, and technologies. We
believe we can integrate and generate value from acquisitions
due to our scale, breadth of capabilities, and common technology
platform.
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to monetize Internet media, coupled with client
demand for our services, provides us with a particular advantage
in acquiring targeted online media properties in the verticals
on which we focus.
|
|
|
|
Our capabilities in online media can allow us to generate a
greater volume of leads or clicks, and therefore create more
value, than other owners of marketing services companies that
have aggregated client budgets or relationships.
|
|
|
|
We can often apply technologies across our business volume to
create more value than previous owners of the technology.
|
Scale
We are one of the largest Internet vertical marketing and media
companies in the world. Our scale allows us to better meet the
needs of large clients for reliability, volume and quality of
service. It allows us to invest more in technologies that
improve media yield, client results and our operating
efficiency. We are also able to invest more in other forms of
research and development, including determining and developing
new types of vertical media, new approaches to engaging website
visitors, and new segments of Internet visitors and client
budgets, all of which can lead to advantages in media costs,
effectiveness in delivering client results, and then to more
growth and greater scale.
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to be one of the largest and most successful
marketing and media companies on the Internet, and eventually in
other digitized media forms. We believe that we are in the early
stages of a very large and long-term business opportunity. Our
strategy for pursuing this opportunity includes the following
key components:
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on generating sustainable revenues by providing
measurable value to our clients.
|
|
|
|
Build QuinStreet and our industry sustainably by behaving
ethically in all we do and by providing quality content and
website experiences to Internet visitors.
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
Remain vertically focused, choosing to grow through depth,
expertise and coverage in our current industry verticals; enter
new verticals selectively over time, organically and through
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Build a world class organization, with
best-in-class
capabilities for delivering measurable marketing results to
clients and high yields or returns on media costs.
|
|
|
|
Develop and evolve the best technologies and platform for
managing vertical marketing and media on the Internet; focus on
technologies that enhance media yield, improve client results
and achieve scale efficiencies.
|
|
|
|
Build, buy and partner with vertical content websites that
provide the most relevant and highest quality visitor
experiences in the client and media verticals we serve.
|
|
|
|
Be a client-driven organization; develop a broad set of media
sources and capabilities to reliably meet client needs.
|
Our
Culture
Our values are the foundation of our successful business
culture. They represent the standards we strive to achieve and
the organization we continuously seek to become. These have been
our guiding principles since our founding in 1999. Our values
are:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Performance. We understand our business
objectives and apply a whatever it takes approach to
meeting them. We are driven to achieve. We are committed to our
own personal and professional development and to that of our
colleagues.
|
|
|
2.
|
High Standards. We hold each other and
ourselves to the highest standards of performance,
professionalism and personal behavior. We act with the highest
of ethical standards. We tolerate and forgive mistakes, but not
patterns.
|
|
|
3.
|
Teamwork. We deal with one another
openly, honestly and non-hierarchically in an atmosphere of
mutual trust and respect and in pursuit of common stretch goals.
We have an obligation to dissent in an effort to reach the best
answers. We smooth the way for effective, dynamic team
discussions by demonstrating care and concern for each
individual in all of our interactions. We support decisions,
once made.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Customer Empathy. We strive every day
to better understand and anticipate the needs of our customers,
including our website visitors, clients and publishers. We
leverage our unique insights into higher customer loyalty and
competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Prioritization. We always work on what
is most important to achieving Company objectives first. If we
do not know, we ask or discuss competing demands.
|
|
|
6.
|
Urgency. We know our goals and measure
our progress toward them daily.
|
|
|
7.
|
Progress. We are pioneers. We make
decisions based on facts and analysis, as well as intuition, but
we expect to make mistakes in the pursuit of rapid progress. We
learn from mistakes on short cycle times and iterate our way to
success.
|
|
|
8.
|
Innovation and Flexibility. We prize
creativity. We embrace new ideas and approaches as opportunities
to improve our performance or work environment. We resist pride
of authorship; it limits progress. We actively benchmark and
work to understand and employ best practices.
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Recognition. We are a meritocracy.
Advancement and recognition are earned through contribution and
performance. We celebrate each others victories and
efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Fun. We believe that work, done well,
can and should be fun. We strive to create an upbeat, supportive
environment and try not to take ourselves too seriously. We do
not tolerate negativism, pessimism or nay saying...we dont
have time.
|
68
Clients
In fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the three months ended
September 30, 2009, our top 20 clients accounted for 76%,
70%, 68% and 70% of net revenue, respectively. Our largest
client, DeVry Inc., accounted for 22%, 23%, 19% and 13% of net
revenue in these periods, respectively. Since our service was
first offered in 2001, we have developed a broad client base
with many multi-year relationships. We enter into Internet
marketing contracts with our clients, most of which are
cancelable with little or no prior notice. In addition, these
contracts do not contain penalty provisions for cancellation
before the end of the contract term.
Sales and
Marketing
We have an internal sales team that consists of employees
focused on signing new clients and account managers who maintain
and seek to increase our business with existing clients. Our
sales people and account managers are each focused on a
particular client business vertical so that they develop an
expertise in the marketing needs of our clients in that
particular vertical.
Our marketing programs include attendance at trade shows and
conferences and limited advertising.
Technology
and Infrastructure
We have developed a suite of technologies to manage, improve and
measure the results of the marketing programs we offer our
clients. We use a combination of proprietary and third-party
software as well as hardware from established technology
vendors. We use specialized software for client management,
building and managing websites, acquiring and managing media,
managing our third-party publishers, and the matching of
Internet visitors to our marketing clients. We have invested
significantly in these technologies and plan to continue to do
so to meet the demands of our clients and Internet visitors, to
increase the scalability of our operations, and enhance
management information systems and analytics in our operations.
Our development teams work closely with our marketing and
operating teams to develop applications and systems that can be
used across our business. For the fiscal years 2007, 2008 and
2009 and the three months ended September 30, 2009, we
spent $14.1 million, $14.1 million, $14.9 million
and $4.5 million, respectively, on product development.
Our primary data center is at a third-party co-location center
in San Francisco, California. All of the critical
components of the system are redundant and we have a backup data
center in Las Vegas, Nevada. We have implemented these backup
systems and redundancies to minimize the risk associated with
earthquakes, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, and
other events beyond our control.
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a combination of trade secret, trademark, copyright
and patent laws in the United States and other jurisdictions
together with confidentiality agreements and technical measures
to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary rights. We
currently have one patent application pending in the United
States and no issued patents. We rely much more heavily on trade
secret protection than patent protection. To protect our trade
secrets, we control access to our proprietary systems and
technology and enter into confidentiality and invention
assignment agreements with our employees and consultants and
confidentiality agreements with other third parties. QuinStreet
is a registered trademark in the United States and other
jurisdictions. We also have registered and unregistered
trademarks for the names of many of our websites and we own the
domain registrations for our many website domains.
We cannot guarantee that our intellectual property rights will
provide competitive advantages to us; our ability to assert our
intellectual property rights against potential competitors or to
settle current or future disputes will not be limited by our
agreements with third parties; our intellectual property rights
will be enforced in jurisdictions where competition may be
intense or where legal protection may be weak; any of the trade
secrets, trademarks, copyrights, patents or other intellectual
property rights that we presently employ in our business will
not lapse or be invalidated, circumvented, challenged, or
abandoned; competitors will not
69
design around our protected systems and technology; or that we
will not lose the ability to assert our intellectual property
rights against others.
Our
Competitors
Our primary competition falls into two categories: advertising
and direct marketing services agencies and online marketing and
media companies. We compete for business on the basis of a
number of factors including return on marketing expenditures,
price, access to targeted media, ability to deliver large
volumes or precise types of customer prospects, and reliability.
Advertising
and direct marketing services agencies
Online and offline advertising and direct marketing services
agencies control the majority of the large client marketing
spending for which we primarily compete. So, while they are
sometimes our competitors, agencies are also often our clients.
We compete with agencies to attract marketing budget or spending
from offline forms to the Internet or, once designated to be
spent online, to be spent with us versus the agency or by the
agency with others. When spending online, agencies spend with
QuinStreet and with portals, other websites and ad networks.
Online
marketing and media companies
We compete with other Internet marketing and media companies, in
many forms, for online marketing budgets. Most of these
competitors compete with us in one vertical. Examples include
BankRate in the financial services vertical and Monster
Worldwide in the education vertical. Some of our competition
also comes from agencies or clients spending directly with
larger websites or portals, including Google, Yahoo!, MSN, and
AOL.
Government
Regulation
Advertising and promotional information presented to visitors on
our websites and our other marketing activities are subject to
federal and state consumer protection laws that regulate unfair
and deceptive practices. There are a variety of state and
federal restrictions on the marketing activities conducted by
telephone, the mail or by email, or over the internet, including
the Telemarketing Sales Rule, state telemarketing laws, federal
and state privacy laws, the CAN-SPAM Act, and the Federal Trade
Commission Act and its accompanying regulations and guidelines.
In addition, some of our clients operate in regulated
industries, particularly in our financial services, education
and medical verticals. For example, the U.S. Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act, or RESPA, regulates the payments that
may be made to mortgage brokers. While we do not engage in the
activities of a traditional mortgage broker, we are licensed as
a mortgage broker in 25 states for our online marketing
activities. In our education vertical, our clients are subject
to the U.S. Higher Education Act, which, among other
things, prohibits incentive compensation in recruiting students.
The U.S. Department of Education is currently engaged in a
negotiated rulemaking process in which it has suggested
repealing all existing safe harbors regarding incentive
compensation in recruiting, including the Internet safe harbor.
While we believe that our fee per lead model does not constitute
incentive compensation for purposes of the Higher Education Act,
the results of the negotiated rulemaking could impact how we are
paid for leads by clients in our education vertical and could
also impact our education clients and their marketing practices.
In our medical vertical, our medical device and supplies clients
are subject to state and federal anti-kickback statutes that
prohibit payment for referrals. While we believe our matching of
prospective customers with our clients and the manner in which
we are paid for these activities complies with these and other
applicable regulations, these rules and regulations in many
cases were not developed with online marketing in mind and their
applicability is not always clear. The rules and regulations are
complex and may be subject to different interpretations by
courts or other governmental authorities. We might
unintentionally violate such laws, such laws may be modified and
new laws may be enacted in the future. Any such developments (or
developments stemming from enactment or modification of other
laws) or the failure to anticipate accurately the application or
interpretation of these laws could create liability to us,
result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our businesses.
70
Employees
As of September 30, 2009, we had 477 employees, which
included 152 employees in product development and
engineering, 62 in sales and marketing, 52 in general and
administration and 211 in operations. None of our employees is
represented by a labor union.
Facilities
Our principal executive offices are located in a leased facility
in Foster City, California, consisting of approximately
53,877 square feet of office space under a lease that
expires in October 2010. This facility accommodates our
principal engineering, sales, marketing, operations and finance
and administrative activities. As of September 30, 2009, we
also lease buildings in Arkansas, Colorado, Massachusetts,
Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, India, and
the United Kingdom. These facilities total approximately
45,222 square feet. We believe that our current facilities
are sufficient for our current needs. We intend to add new
facilities and expand our existing facilities as we add
employees and expand our markets, and we believe that suitable
additional or substitute space will be available as needed to
accommodate any such expansion of our operations.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings
and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We
are not currently a party to any material litigation.
71